Author
Listed:
- Tang, Weiwei
- Dang, Chao
- Xu, Jun
Abstract
Active learning methods have emerged as a powerful tool in structural reliability analysis. However, conventional approaches may still fall short in terms of efficiency, accuracy, and applicability when addressing complex real-world problems. To this end, this study develops a novel active learning method called ‘parallel active learning XGBoost’ (PALX). In this method, the XGBoost model is employed as a surrogate for the true performance function instead of the commonly used Kriging model, with prediction uncertainty quantified through cross-validation. By assuming that the resulting predictions follow a Gaussian process, a convenient failure probability estimator and a robust stopping criterion are introduced, which are adapted from a well-established Bayesian active learning method. The failure probability estimator and stopping criterion are numerically solved using the sequential variance-amplified importance sampling. Furthermore, a new learning function, termed ‘prediction variance-weighted epistemic uncertainty contribution’, is proposed for identifying the best next evaluation point. To enable parallel computing, a multi-point selection method called ‘lower confidence bound believer’ is developed. The effectiveness of PALX is demonstrated through three numerical examples and a practical engineering problem involving an onshore wind turbine tower. It is shown that PALX can significantly reduce computational costs without compromising accuracy, demonstrating its potential for real-world engineering challenges.
Suggested Citation
Tang, Weiwei & Dang, Chao & Xu, Jun, 2026.
"Parallel active learning XGBoost for structural reliability analysis with application to an onshore wind turbine tower,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025005915
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111390
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025005915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.