Author
Listed:
- Yang, Xue
- Zhou, Tao
- Utne, Ingrid Bouwer
- Zhang, Wenjun
Abstract
The rapid development of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) marks a significant leap towards enhanced efficiency and safety in the maritime industry. In this context, a transition process between modes of operation (MoO) is crucial for maintaining navigational safety and operational effectiveness. These transitions, however, may introduce complex functional couplings that generate performance fluctuations, posing new challenges for navigation safety. Despite increasing focus on MASS safety, current research lacks a systematic approach to identify coupling risks during MoO transitions. To fill this gap, this study presents a four-step quantitative framework that integrates Sequentially Timed Events Plotting, the Functional Resonance Analysis Method and Monte Carlo simulations. The framework identifies key functions and their interrelations during MoO transitions, quantifies the performance variability in the couplings, and pinpoints high-risk couplings and resonance paths. A case study focusing on a MASS encountering fishing vessels without Automatic Identification System data is presented to illustrate the framework’s application. The results reveal high-risk resonance paths involving situational awareness of the autonomous navigation system, ship-to-shore data transmission, and decision-making by seafarers on board and remote operators. Twelve measures are proposed, including AI-driven monitoring, multi-sensor fusion, and adaptive communication protocols to mitigate operational risks to ensure safe MoO transitions.
Suggested Citation
Yang, Xue & Zhou, Tao & Utne, Ingrid Bouwer & Zhang, Wenjun, 2025.
"A framework for quantification of coupling risk in the transition between operational modes of MASS,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PB).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006362
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111436
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.