Author
Listed:
- Zhao, Xian
- Li, Ziyue
- Wang, Xiaoyue
- Qi, Xin
Abstract
Some mission-oriented systems run in the complex shock environment, and the shock environment may change multiple times. Most existing studies focusing on the mission abort strategies did not consider the effect of the changing environment on the optimization of mission abort policies, which is inconsistent with the engineering practice. In addition, when studying mission abort strategies, prior research on multi-state systems composed of multi-state components has not fully utilized the state information of the components. To fill the existing research gap, this paper investigates the reliability and mission abort strategies of a multi-state k-out-of-n: F system operating in a dynamic shock environment. The proposed system runs in the dynamically varying shock environment, and the changes between different shock environments follow a Markov process. When the proposed system runs in distinct shock environments, its degradation process and the failure criterion differ, which are associated with the shock environment. Competing mission termination criteria are proposed by incorporating the information of various environments. These criteria trigger the task termination based on the numbers of components in specific state intervals in the system. Markov process imbedding method is applied to derive reliability and cost indicators. Moreover, two optimization models are established to determine the optimal mission abort policy. Finally, an application based on an unmanned aerial vehicle system for executing tasks is presented, demonstrating the applicability of the proposed reliability model and mission abort strategy.
Suggested Citation
Zhao, Xian & Li, Ziyue & Wang, Xiaoyue & Qi, Xin, 2025.
"Reliability and mission abort strategy for a multi-state k-out-of-n: F system in a dynamically changing shock environment,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PB).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006337
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111433
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.