IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v264y2025ipbs0951832025006180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient reliability assessment of multi-performance multi-state systems using dynamic matching of source and load feasible regions

Author

Listed:
  • Tie, Yingqi
  • Shao, Changzheng
  • Hu, Bo
  • Zio, Enrico
  • Huang, Wei

Abstract

Multi-performance multi-state systems (MPMS) that consider performance conversion processes represent a current modeling approach for engineering systems, where different types of performance can be exchanged and converted. However, in large-scale MPMS, the complexity of performance variables and performance conversion characteristics significantly increases the computational burden of accurate reliability assessment. To address this challenge, this paper proposes an efficient reliability assessment method for large-scale MPMS considering performance conversion, based on the concept of feasible regions. The proposed method introduces the MPMS model and classifies the system into two categories: source-side MPMS and load-side MPMS, based on the characteristics of performance variables. The states and performance conversion characteristics of MPMS are described using feasible regions, while system adequacy is determined through the spatial relationship between feasible regions. The performance loss of the system is quantified by calculating the shortest Euclidean distance between the feasible regions of the two types of MPMS. Finally, system reliability is evaluated through dynamic matching of feasible regions. The proposed model and method are validated through two case studies, demonstrating their efficiency and effectiveness in assessing the reliability of MPMS.

Suggested Citation

  • Tie, Yingqi & Shao, Changzheng & Hu, Bo & Zio, Enrico & Huang, Wei, 2025. "Efficient reliability assessment of multi-performance multi-state systems using dynamic matching of source and load feasible regions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006180
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025006180
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.