IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v264y2025ipbs0951832025006179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robustness analysis of CPPS against malware attacks under malware incubation and attack–defense confrontation

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Jinfu
  • Tu, Haicheng
  • Xia, Yongxiang
  • Yang, Xuetao
  • Zhu, Yibo

Abstract

The integration of advanced technologies in Cyber-Physical Power System (CPPS) has increased the vulnerability to cyber threats. Consequently, many network science-based studies have sought to analyze the robustness of CPPS against Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs). Compared with previous studies, our framework incorporates the malware incubation period, incomplete attacker information, coupling patterns, and reconnaissance-evasion behavior, thereby covering a broader spectrum of scenarios. Based on our framework, we first quantify the tradeoff between incubation duration and attack success rate to identify the optimal attack launch time. Subsequently, we investigate how system robustness is affected by critical parameters across various scenarios. Simulation experiments reveal that the attackers’ incomplete information delays the optimal launch time. Disassortative coupling patterns can mitigate malware impact and enhance CPPS robustness. Furthermore, results demonstrate two distinct defensive resource allocation strategies for optimal CPPS robustness. In the disassortatively coupled CPPS, defenders must continuously adjust the deployment of defensive assets as the relative attack–defense budget shifts, whereas under assortative coupling a quasi-static deployment of defensive assets suffices to attain optimal robustness. These insights provide cost-effective guidelines for strengthening the robustness of CPPS.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Jinfu & Tu, Haicheng & Xia, Yongxiang & Yang, Xuetao & Zhu, Yibo, 2025. "Robustness analysis of CPPS against malware attacks under malware incubation and attack–defense confrontation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006179
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025006179
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.