IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v264y2025ipbs0951832025006143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on fire risk quantification for extralong highway tunnels based on Wuli–Shili–Renli theory, dempster–shafer theory, and bayesian network

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Jie
  • Yang, Xiaolin
  • Yang, Yi
  • Wang, Wanqing
  • Chen, Ziyu
  • Ding, Fanshu
  • Zhu, Haoyuan

Abstract

The fire risk of extralong highway tunnels (ELHTs) is a significant concern because of their severe consequences. To achieve a quantitative assessment of ELHT fire risk, this paper proposes a fire risk assessment model that integrates Wuli–Shili–Renli (WSR) theory, Dempster–Shafer (DS) evidence theory, and Bayesian network (BN). First, on the basis of WSR theory, fire risk factors are identified from three dimensions—human, physical, and managerial—and an evaluation index system is established. The factors are then mapped into a BN structure, with DS evidence theory and expert knowledge used to calculate conditional probabilities. The prior probabilities are determined using a risk quantification table, and reasoning analysis and sensitivity analysis are conducted to identify the risk level and key indicators. The model is validated through axioms and a case study. Finally, the method is applied to an ELHT, the results reveal that the fire risk of the tunnel is 13.5 %, which is classified as low risk, with "tunnel length" and "traffic volume" identified as key indicators. The study demonstrated that the WSR–DS–BN model has good applicability and interpretability, providing theoretical support and technical assistance for fire risk assessment of ELHTs.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Jie & Yang, Xiaolin & Yang, Yi & Wang, Wanqing & Chen, Ziyu & Ding, Fanshu & Zhu, Haoyuan, 2025. "Research on fire risk quantification for extralong highway tunnels based on Wuli–Shili–Renli theory, dempster–shafer theory, and bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006143
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025006143
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.