Author
Listed:
- Hu, Zuoan
- Yang, Jianghao
- Chang, Shixi
- Zhang, Yanping
Abstract
In recent years, as public transportation has become the primary mode of travel for urban residents, the passenger load on transit networks has continued to increase. However, most existing studies on cascading failures in transportation networks are based on static topological structures, neglecting the temporal dynamics of passenger flow and their impact on node load distribution and failure propagation paths. Additionally, traditional models often regard passengers as “passive agents†who redistribute uniformly after disruptions, lacking a realistic depiction of travel preferences and behavioral decision-making. This oversimplification fails to capture the nonlinear transfer characteristics of passenger responses under real-world disruption scenarios, limiting the scientific accuracy of robustness assessments. To address these limitations, this study proposes a passenger flow redistribution model that incorporates metro travel preferences and introduces a flow-based edge failure (FE) metric to characterize network degradation under cascading impacts. By integrating mode choice behavior with dynamic inter-node flow transfer rules, a behaviorally responsive cascading failure simulation framework is constructed, offering a new perspective for quantifying the robustness of bus–metro coupled transit networks. Based on data from Chengdu’s bus and metro systems, simulation experiments are conducted for typical time periods on both holidays and weekdays. Results show that during all periods on holidays and the two morning peak periods on weekdays, network robustness is significantly enhanced when passengers prefer metro travel. In contrast, during the two hours following the morning peak on weekdays, higher robustness is observed in the absence of such preferences.
Suggested Citation
Hu, Zuoan & Yang, Jianghao & Chang, Shixi & Zhang, Yanping, 2025.
"Robustness analysis of bus-rail multilayer network based on dynamic passenger flow,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PB).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006039
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111403
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.