Author
Listed:
- Zhang, Liye
- Gu, Kewang
- Ma, Zhicheng
- Wu, Bing
- Song, Jie
Abstract
Collisions between container ships and fishing ships frequently result in significant consequences, particularly in China. To assess the collision risk of ship cross-meetings in the warning area, this study constructed a collision risk model using historical AIS data. The risk influencing factors included relative distance, relative speed, relative bearing, distance closest point of approach (DCPA) and time closest point of approach (TCPA). We extracted pairs of trajectories of ships of different types (container ships and fishing ships) and employed the entropy approach to calculate the weights of each risk factor for the modelling of collisions between two ships in real time. Our findings indicate that the collision risk during a two-ship cross-meeting increases gradually as the meeting progresses, reaching a maximum value (approximately 0.66) at the point of nearest proximity, after which it decreases. A comparison and analysis of the three areas revealed that the warning area represented a high-risk area for the cross-meeting. In order to calculate the weight value of each ship and assess the real-time collision risk during the multi-ship cross-meeting, the Shapley value method was employed. The results indicate that the collision risk of a multi-ship encounter is significantly higher than that of a two-ship encounter. Furthermore, the change in risk values is more complex. This study not only quantifies the risk between two ships, but also provides a new method to quantify the risk of multiple ships. This provides important theoretical support for the safety of ship navigation.
Suggested Citation
Zhang, Liye & Gu, Kewang & Ma, Zhicheng & Wu, Bing & Song, Jie, 2025.
"Modelling collision risk between container and fishing ships during cross encounter in a cordon area,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PB).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025005745
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111373
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025005745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.