Author
Listed:
- Yang, Jiayang
- Zhao, Chunhui
Abstract
Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has been extensively employed in data-driven industrial anomaly detection. However, due to the difficulty of reliably acquiring the operating status of industrial processes, most process data may be collected without rigorous examination, resulting in uncertainty regarding their exact statuses and limiting their safe utilization for AI-powered anomaly detection modeling. Additionally, samples with definite annotations could still be subject to misjudgment of statuses by manual error, thereby exposing anomaly detection modeling to a significant risk of misleading. In this work, we accomplish anomaly detection as a binary classification task and recognize the aforementioned challenges as a modeling dilemma involving sample labels (annotations indicating their operating statuses, i.e., normal/abnormal), where the available labels are insufficient and unreliable simultaneously. Thereupon, a self-semi-supervised step-wise complementary label boosting (S4CLB) strategy is proposed to address that dilemma. The S4CLB strategy mainly consists of two stages, in the first stage, the self-supervised contrastive autoencoding Gaussian mixture model (CAGMM) is developed to provide representations of all the process samples for the subsequent anomaly detection by describing their data distribution information with low-dimensional features. In the second stage, a semi-supervised label boosting strategy is designed in a step-wise manner. Specifically, the noisy label filtering and adaptive label enrichment are conducted alternately to boost the sufficiency and reliability of available labels regressively. Meanwhile, the robust dual complementary classifier (RDCC) model comprising two peer classifiers with robustness and different views is developed to achieve the prompt feedback for label boosting, thus the reliability of label adjustment is further guaranteed. Finally, the anomaly detection results are obtained by the RDCC model. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by a real industrial process.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025005708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.