Author
Listed:
- Zelmati, Djamel
- Bouledroua, Omar
- Ghelloudj, Oualid
- Harouz, Riad
Abstract
It is crucial to note that developing a maintenance and repair strategy by statistically consolidating the corrosion features across the pipeline length ultimately yields a single probability of failure for the entire line, potentially obscuring the distinct statistical behavior of individual pipe segments. Since the corrosion profiles in different segments of the pipeline are statistically correlated, failure in one section can affect neighboring sections, which defines the overall system reliability. In this study, the remaining strength of a corroded pipeline was estimated using the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD). A comprehensive statistical analysis identified the typical probability density functions of all random variables in the failure scenario, as well as their standard deviations and typical correlation coefficients. A Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) was integrated with the SINTAP procedure to construct a probabilistic FAD. Sensitivity analysis revealed the relative influence of each variable on the pipeline’s remaining strength, emphasizing a strong interaction between defect depth and wall thickness. Additionally, the combined effect of the operating pressure and the coefficient of variation of the corrosion defect depth was evaluated to understand their influence on the probability of failure. Furthermore, system reliability assessment allows for more precise risk management, avoiding overly conservative or optimistic estimates that might arise from treating the entire pipeline as a single unit. Besides, the developed procedure for global system reliability can be used to devise optimal and more accurate inspection and maintenance schedules.
Suggested Citation
Zelmati, Djamel & Bouledroua, Omar & Ghelloudj, Oualid & Harouz, Riad, 2025.
"Advanced statistical analysis and system reliability assessment of API 5L steel pipelines subjected to corrosion attack,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PA).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832025005885
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111387
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832025005885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.