IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v264y2025ipas0951832025005848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new method of interval Bayesian penalized network for gravelly soil seismic liquefaction prediction considering parameter confidence and model flaws uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jing
  • Hu, Jilei

Abstract

Seismic liquefaction prediction of gravelly soils is a complex systematic problem involving multiple uncertainties. Existing studies ignore the parameter confidence uncertainty introduced during the simplification of liquefaction field test data and the model flaws in the model uncertainty. This study proposes a new Interval Bayesian Penalty Network (IBPN) method. The IBPN characterizes, employing interval probabilities, the parameter uncertainty introduced by using the mean value to represent the whole critical liquefiable soil layer when the data are simplified, and subsequently dynamically optimize false negative and false positive errors in liquefaction predictions by introducing a risk-sensitive penalty function. By comparing with five existing methods, including those that consider the uncertainties, the results show that the IBPN method significantly outperforms the other algorithms in terms of prediction accuracy after simultaneously resolving the uncertainties caused by data simplification and prediction errors. The discussion revealed that considering parameter uncertainty is more important than consideration of model flaws for improving prediction accuracy. In addition, the validation of new historical seismic liquefaction data demonstrates the effectiveness and generalization ability of the IBPN method. This work not only provides a more accurate tool for gravelly soil liquefaction risk assessment but also suggests new research ideas for dealing with complex uncertain systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jing & Hu, Jilei, 2025. "A new method of interval Bayesian penalized network for gravelly soil seismic liquefaction prediction considering parameter confidence and model flaws uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832025005848
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025005848
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111383?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832025005848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.