IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v264y2025ipas0951832025005514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A two-layer air traffic dynamic network based en route cascading failure propagation dynamics modeling and multi-dimensional impact analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Dan
  • Yin, Jianan
  • Zhong, Yugang
  • Tang, Cheng

Abstract

This study proposes an en route cascading failure propagation dynamics model based on a two-layer air traffic dynamic network by characterizing the dynamic interaction between the spatial–temporal transmission of air traffic and the evolution of the en route network structure due to failure propagation. On this basis, a multi-dimensional impact analysis method is conducted to evaluate the overall impact of cascading failures from various aspects, including network structure, control service capacity, traffic demand, and operational efficiency. A case study of an en route network in Shanghai demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed cascading failure evolution framework in successfully capturing the dynamic process of failure propagation and self-recovery, as well as the accuracy of the proposed multi-dimensional impact analysis method to better reflect the overall impact of cascading failures in the en route network.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Dan & Yin, Jianan & Zhong, Yugang & Tang, Cheng, 2025. "A two-layer air traffic dynamic network based en route cascading failure propagation dynamics modeling and multi-dimensional impact analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832025005514
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025005514
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832025005514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.