IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v264y2025ipas0951832025005125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety assurance of Machine Learning for autonomous systems

Author

Listed:
  • Paterson, Colin
  • Hawkins, Richard
  • Picardi, Chiara
  • Jia, Yan
  • Calinescu, Radu
  • Habli, Ibrahim

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) components are increasingly incorporated into systems, with different degrees of autonomy, where model performance is reported as meeting, or exceeding, the capabilities of human experts. This promises to transform products and services, in diverse domains such as healthcare, transport and manufacturing, to better serve underrepresented groups, reduce costs, and increase delivery effectiveness, especially where expert resources are scarce. The greatest potential for transformative impact lies in the development of autonomous systems for safety-critical applications where their acceptance, and subsequent deployment, is reliant on establishing justified confidence in system safety. Creating a compelling safety case for ML is challenging however, particularly since the ML development lifecycle is significantly different to that employed for traditional software systems. Typically ML development involves replacing detailed software specifications with representative data sets from which models of behaviour is learnt. Indeed, ML’s strength lies in tackling problems which are challenging for traditional software development practices. This shift in development practices introduces challenges to established assurance processes which are crucial to developing the compelling safety case required for regulation and societal acceptance. In this paper we introduce the first methodology for the Assurance of Machine Learning for use in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS). The AMLAS process describes how to systematically and attractively integrate safety assurance into the development of ML components and how to generate the evidence base for explicitly justifying the acceptable safety of these components when integrated into autonomous system applications. We describe the use of AMLAS by considering how a safety case may be constructed for an object detector for use in the perception pipeline of an autonomous driving application. We further discuss how AMLAS has been applied in several domains including healthcare, automotive and aerospace as well as supporting policy and industry guidance for defence, healthcare and automotive.

Suggested Citation

  • Paterson, Colin & Hawkins, Richard & Picardi, Chiara & Jia, Yan & Calinescu, Radu & Habli, Ibrahim, 2025. "Safety assurance of Machine Learning for autonomous systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832025005125
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025005125
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832025005125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.