Author
Listed:
- Johnson, Karl
- Morais, Caroline
- Patelli, Edoardo
Abstract
In high-risk industrial environments, the clarity and accuracy of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are critical for ensuring safety and regulatory compliance. The presence of ambiguities in SOPs can lead to misunderstandings, errors, and increased risks. While violations of procedural directives can significantly contribute to catastrophic outcomes. This study introduces the development of sophisticated tools utilizing both rule-based and machine learning methodologies in Natural Language Processing (NLP) specifically designed to detect ambiguities and identify high-risk steps prone to non-malevolent violation in procedural documentation. By addressing these linguistic and procedural discrepancies, we aim to enhance the clarity and applicability of SOPs, ultimately improving adherence and reducing risks in complex operational settings. The tools leverages a blend of linguistic rules to systematically identify and categorize ambiguities, and machine learning techniques with historical data to identify procedural directives with high-risk potential when violated. This enhances the precision and practical application of SOPs in sectors such as nuclear, oil and gas, and chemical processing. Initial tests demonstrate the tools’ effectiveness and promising applicability. This approach not only aids in refining SOPs but also contributes to the broader objective of enhancing operational safety and efficiency. The research underscores the importance of integrating advanced NLP techniques with traditional safety management practices to address the inherent challenges of procedural documentation in complex industrial settings.
Suggested Citation
Johnson, Karl & Morais, Caroline & Patelli, Edoardo, 2025.
"Enhancing procedure quality: Advanced language tools for identifying ambiguity and high-potential violation triggers,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PA).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832025005095
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111308
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832025005095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.