IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v264y2025ipas0951832025005009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probabilistic functionality loss rate model of bridge network for regional seismic fragility analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhong, Jian
  • Zhou, Sien
  • Wang, Hao

Abstract

The evaluation of traffic functionality of bridge networks in post-earthquake is essential for rescue and reconstruction. The previous studies have a limitation of combination with individual bridge seismic performance analysis and network traffic functionality analysis, which brings a great difficulty to rational aseismic decision making at network-level. Therefore, a probabilistic functionality loss rate model (PFLRM) is established for bridge network. For estimating the network functionality loss, a novel index is defined in PFLRM, named functionality loss rate (FLR). Moreover, the assessment method of FLR is also provided accounting for seismic intensity measure (IM), individual bridge parameters and network topology. In addition, for improving the obtaining efficiency of FLR, a quantified model between FLR and IM is established, which has the advantages of applicability, accuracy and efficiency. The precision of proposed PFLRM is compared by Monte Carlo method on twelve benchmark networks. Finally, the proposed model can be applied on a real network for regional seismic fragility analysis to identify important bridges and make repair strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhong, Jian & Zhou, Sien & Wang, Hao, 2025. "Probabilistic functionality loss rate model of bridge network for regional seismic fragility analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832025005009
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025005009
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832025005009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.