IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v263y2025ics095183202500465x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferred decision for industrial equipment operation rotation considering health state based on belief rule base and evidential reasoning

Author

Listed:
  • Lian, Zheng
  • Feng, Zhi-Chao
  • Zhou, Zhi-Jie
  • Hu, Chang-Hua
  • Hu, Lai-Hong
  • Zhang, Fu-Qiao

Abstract

The health state of equipment will decline in the long-term operation, resulting in the need to rotate multiple equipment to fulfill the operation task (OT). In the current engineering, three available equipment rotation strategies are summarized. However, the selection of these strategies is arbitrary and the health state of the equipment during operation rotation is neglected, which causes poor benefits and heavy risks. For this purpose, a quantitative decision-making mechanism using belief rule base (BRB) and evidential reasoning (ER) is proposed to determine the preferred strategy. Specifically, BRB serves as the preferred decision model, which reflects the mapping relationship between the OT and the rotation strategy. A parameter optimization model is then designed to improve decision rationality. To obtain the labeled historical OTs required for the parameter optimization model, a hierarchical ER method is developed to evaluate the performance of the rotation strategy to obtain the labeled historical OTs, where the health state of the equipment is quantitatively analyzed. The proposed method comprehensively utilizes knowledge and data and provides a quantitative decision-making framework for equipment operation rotation. A case of the natural gas storage tank (NGST) verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Lian, Zheng & Feng, Zhi-Chao & Zhou, Zhi-Jie & Hu, Chang-Hua & Hu, Lai-Hong & Zhang, Fu-Qiao, 2025. "Preferred decision for industrial equipment operation rotation considering health state based on belief rule base and evidential reasoning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:263:y:2025:i:c:s095183202500465x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202500465X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:263:y:2025:i:c:s095183202500465x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.