IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v263y2025ics095183202500465x.html

Preferred decision for industrial equipment operation rotation considering health state based on belief rule base and evidential reasoning

Author

Listed:
  • Lian, Zheng
  • Feng, Zhi-Chao
  • Zhou, Zhi-Jie
  • Hu, Chang-Hua
  • Hu, Lai-Hong
  • Zhang, Fu-Qiao

Abstract

The health state of equipment will decline in the long-term operation, resulting in the need to rotate multiple equipment to fulfill the operation task (OT). In the current engineering, three available equipment rotation strategies are summarized. However, the selection of these strategies is arbitrary and the health state of the equipment during operation rotation is neglected, which causes poor benefits and heavy risks. For this purpose, a quantitative decision-making mechanism using belief rule base (BRB) and evidential reasoning (ER) is proposed to determine the preferred strategy. Specifically, BRB serves as the preferred decision model, which reflects the mapping relationship between the OT and the rotation strategy. A parameter optimization model is then designed to improve decision rationality. To obtain the labeled historical OTs required for the parameter optimization model, a hierarchical ER method is developed to evaluate the performance of the rotation strategy to obtain the labeled historical OTs, where the health state of the equipment is quantitatively analyzed. The proposed method comprehensively utilizes knowledge and data and provides a quantitative decision-making framework for equipment operation rotation. A case of the natural gas storage tank (NGST) verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Lian, Zheng & Feng, Zhi-Chao & Zhou, Zhi-Jie & Hu, Chang-Hua & Hu, Lai-Hong & Zhang, Fu-Qiao, 2025. "Preferred decision for industrial equipment operation rotation considering health state based on belief rule base and evidential reasoning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:263:y:2025:i:c:s095183202500465x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202500465X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Jian Rui & Zhao, Meng-ke & Lu, Shou-xiang, 2024. "Accident spread and risk propagation mechanism in complex industrial system network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    2. Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    3. Yang, Jian-Bo, 2001. "Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 31-61, May.
    4. Liu, Peide & Li, Ying, 2021. "An improved failure mode and effect analysis method for multi-criteria group decision-making in green logistics risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Barraza, Joaquín Figueroa & Droguett, Enrique López & Martins, Marcelo Ramos, 2024. "SCF-Net: A sparse counterfactual generation network for interpretable fault diagnosis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    6. Xia, Liqiao & Liang, Yongshi & Leng, Jiewu & Zheng, Pai, 2023. "Maintenance planning recommendation of complex industrial equipment based on knowledge graph and graph neural network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    7. Sezer, Sukru Ilke & Akyuz, Emre, 2024. "A conceptual risk modelling for cargo tank fire/explosion in chemical tanker by using Evidential Reasoning -SLIM and Bayesian belief network approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    8. Lian, Zheng & Zhou, Zhi-Jie & Hu, Chang-Hua & Wang, Jie & Zhang, Chun-Chao & Zhang, Chao-Li, 2024. "A health assessment method with attribute importance modeling for complex systems using belief rule base," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    9. Elidolu, Gizem & Sezer, Sukru Ilke & Akyuz, Emre & Arslan, Ozcan & Arslanoglu, Yasin, 2023. "Operational risk assessment of ballasting and de-ballasting on-board tanker ship under FMECA extended Evidential Reasoning (ER) and Rule-based Bayesian Network (RBN) approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Huang, Xucong & Peng, Zhaoqin & Tang, Diyin & Chen, Juan & Zio, Enrico & Zheng, Zaiping, 2024. "A physics-informed autoencoder for system health state assessment based on energy-oriented system performance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    11. She, Jianjun & Guo, Zihao & Li, Zhijian & Liang, Shuwei & Zhou, Yilun, 2024. "Research on scenario deduction and emergency decision-making evaluation for construction safety accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    12. Sonal, & Ghosh, Debomita, 2022. "Impact of situational awareness attributes for resilience assessment of active distribution networks using hybrid dynamic Bayesian multi criteria decision-making approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Hu, Yang & Miao, Xuewen & Si, Yong & Pan, Ershun & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and health management: A review from the perspectives of design, development and decision," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    14. Wang, Ying-Ming & Yang, Jian-Bo & Xu, Dong-Ling, 2006. "Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1885-1913, November.
    15. Kong, Guilan & Xu, Dong-Ling & Body, Richard & Yang, Jian-Bo & Mackway-Jones, Kevin & Carley, Simon, 2012. "A belief rule-based decision support system for clinical risk assessment of cardiac chest pain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 564-573.
    16. Mi, Yunlong & Wang, Zongrun & Quan, Pei & Shi, Yong, 2024. "A semi-supervised concept-cognitive computing system for dynamic classification decision making with limited feedback information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1123-1138.
    17. Norman Dalkey & Olaf Helmer, 1963. "An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 458-467, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lian, Zheng & Zhou, Zhi-Jie & Hu, Chang-Hua & Wang, Jie & Zhang, Chun-Chao & Zhang, Chao-Li, 2024. "A health assessment method with attribute importance modeling for complex systems using belief rule base," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    2. Lai, Chenyang & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2026. "Gradient-enhanced physics-informed long short-term memory networks for stable and accurate prediction of the RUL of electronic components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
    3. Guilan Kong & Lili Jiang & Xiaofeng Yin & Tianbing Wang & Dong-Ling Xu & Jian-Bo Yang & Yonghua Hu, 2018. "Combining principal component analysis and the evidential reasoning approach for healthcare quality assessment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 679-699, December.
    4. Park, Hyung Jun & Kim, Nam H. & Choi, Joo-Ho, 2024. "A robust health prediction using Bayesian approach guided by physical constraints," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    5. J-B Yang & D-L Xu & X Xie & A K Maddulapalli, 2011. "Multicriteria evidential reasoning decision modelling and analysis—prioritizing voices of customer," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1638-1654, September.
    6. Wang, Shi-ao & Wang, Shibin & Wang, Wei & Zheng, Yiming & Ding, Baoqing & Yan, Ruqiang & Chen, Xuefeng, 2025. "Unrolled sparse coding via lifting wavelet for interpretable intelligent fault diagnosis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PB).
    7. Zuo, Jian & Cadet, Catherine & Li, Zhongliang & Bérenguer, Christophe & Outbib, Rachid, 2024. "A deterioration-aware energy management strategy for the lifetime improvement of a multi-stack fuel cell system subject to a random dynamic load," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. Wang, Chu & Dou, Manfeng & Li, Zhongliang & Outbib, Rachid & Zhao, Dongdong & Zuo, Jian & Wang, Yuanlin & Liang, Bin & Wang, Peng, 2023. "Data-driven prognostics based on time-frequency analysis and symbolic recurrent neural network for fuel cells under dynamic load," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    9. Zhou, Zhi-Jie & Hu, Chang-Hua & Xu, Dong-Ling & Chen, Mao-Yin & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2010. "A model for real-time failure prognosis based on hidden Markov model and belief rule base," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 269-283, November.
    10. Zheng, Rui & Najafi, Seyedvahid & Zhang, Yingzhi, 2022. "A recursive method for the health assessment of systems using the proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    11. Xiaojiao Qiao & Dan Shi, 2019. "Risk Analysis of Emergency Based on Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-10, November.
    12. Zhou, Liang & Wang, Huawei, 2024. "An adaptive multi-scale feature fusion and adaptive mixture-of-experts multi-task model for industrial equipment health status assessment and remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    13. Chaoyu Zheng & Benhong Peng & Xuan Zhao & Guo Wei & Anxia Wan & Mu Yue, 2025. "Power battery third-party reverse logistics provider selection: Fuzzy evidential reasoning," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(1), pages 323-355, February.
    14. Jun Liu & Jian-Bo Yang & Da Ruan & Luis Martinez & Jin Wang, 2008. "Self-tuning of fuzzy belief rule bases for engineering system safety analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 143-168, October.
    15. Zhao, Yunfei & Vaddi, Pavan Kumar & Pietrykowski, Michael & Khafizov, Marat & Smidts, Carol, 2023. "An empirical study of the added value of the sequential learning of model parameters to industrial system health monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    16. Meng, Huixing & Liu, Xuan & Xing, Jinduo & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "A method for economic evaluation of predictive maintenance technologies by integrating system dynamics and evolutionary game modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    17. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Maintenance optimization in industry 4.0," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    18. Liu, Guanyi & Liu, Shifeng & Li, Xuewei & Li, Xueyan & Gong, Daqing, 2025. "Multiscenario deduction analysis for railway emergencies using knowledge metatheory and dynamic Bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    19. Meng, Huixing & Geng, Mengyao & Xing, Jinduo & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "A hybrid method for prognostics of lithium-ion batteries capacity considering regeneration phenomena," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    20. Compare, Michele & Antonello, Federico & Pinciroli, Luca & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "A general model for life-cycle cost analysis of Condition-Based Maintenance enabled by PHM capabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:263:y:2025:i:c:s095183202500465x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.