IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v262y2025ics0951832025004466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilience-based importance measure for ultra-high voltage converter stations under mainshock-aftershock sequences

Author

Listed:
  • Xue, Zhihang
  • Wang, Kai
  • Cao, Di
  • Zhou, Siyu
  • Liu, Yu

Abstract

Ultra-high voltage (UHV) converter stations are crucial for power systems, but their towering structures are highly vulnerable to earthquakes. It is, therefore, of great significance to enhance the resilience of the converter stations such that they can withstand and recover promptly from disruptions caused by earthquakes. Nevertheless, the uncertainties associated with earthquakes significantly hinder the post-earthquake recovery process, thus impacting importance ranking of the equipment in UHV converter stations. To address these uncertainties, this article proposes a new resilience-based importance (RBI) measure integrating vulnerability and recoverability under mainshock-aftershock sequences. Specifically, a roulette-wheel damage scenario generation method is adopted to generate equipment damage scenarios considering uncertainties. RBI measures considering cumulative damage effects from mainshock-aftershock sequences are calculated to evaluate equipment vulnerability and recoverability. The Copeland Score (CS) stochastic ranking method ranks equipment RBI, providing an optimal prioritization strategy for post-earthquake recovery. A case study of a ± 800 kV converter station demonstrates the proposed RBI method. Results show the RBI-based recovery strategy improves resilience by 10.4 % compared to traditional performance recovery importance (PRI) method. Neglecting aftershocks would result in approximately a 5.6 % overestimation of resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue, Zhihang & Wang, Kai & Cao, Di & Zhou, Siyu & Liu, Yu, 2025. "Resilience-based importance measure for ultra-high voltage converter stations under mainshock-aftershock sequences," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025004466
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025004466
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111245?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025004466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.