IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v262y2025ics0951832025004028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary safety evaluation of a truss bridge using dynamic Bayesian networks

Author

Listed:
  • Tan, Jia-Li
  • Fang, Sheng-En

Abstract

Timely safety evaluation of a real-world complex truss structure is difficult because of complex failure modes, uncertainty influence and difficulty in theoretical deduction. Therefore, a dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) has been designed to demonstrate the safety evolution process of a truss bridge under a time-varying load. The DBN comprises a prior network and a transition network, forming different time slices. Its network nodes represent the truss members and system, and the discrete nodal variables indicate the probabilities for safety and failure states. An effective network topology definition method is proposed by incorporating a hybrid topology learning strategy with a virtual substructure division strategy. The two strategies provide a rational topology with the reduced dimensions of conditional probability tables for complex truss structures. Numerical observation data are generated for learning the conditional probabilities between connected nodes in both the prior and transition networks. Subsequently, state probability inference between different time slices can be achieved using measured observation data from a limited number of members at a given time as the evidence. Afterwards, the failure state probability evolution curve of the truss bridge system can be described. The validation on an experimental truss bridge model has successfully demonstrated its state evolution under the different loading periods. The failure time of the truss system was predicted, which well accorded with the experimental observations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tan, Jia-Li & Fang, Sheng-En, 2025. "Evolutionary safety evaluation of a truss bridge using dynamic Bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025004028
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025004028
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025004028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.