IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v262y2025ics0951832025003989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal aborting in cumulative parallel missions with individual and common shocks

Author

Listed:
  • Levitin, Gregory
  • Xing, Liudong
  • Dai, Yuanshun

Abstract

Mission systems (e.g., drones, aircraft) often operate in random shock environments. Existing reliability studies have mostly assumed either individual or common shock processes, which may deteriorate a single component or multiple components simultaneously. This paper advances the state of the art by modeling a mission system with multiple components that undergo both individual and common shocks, operating in parallel and contributing cumulatively to the mission success. To avoid excessive components losses, a shock-based, interval-dependent abort policy is proposed and designed to minimize the expected mission losses (EML). A new numerical procedure is put forward to assess the mission success probability and the expected number of lost components, which are then used to determine the EML. Based on the EML evaluation and a suggested string solution representation, the genetic algorithm is implemented to solve the EML minimization problems under fixed and dynamic possible aborting times (PAT). A detailed case study of a multi-drone target destruction mission system is conducted to demonstrate the proposed model. The impacts of several model parameters (mission failure penalty, common shock rate, number of system components, and number of PAT) on mission performance metrics and optimization solutions are also investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2025. "Optimal aborting in cumulative parallel missions with individual and common shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003989
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025003989
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.