IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v262y2025ics0951832025003783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust uncertainty quantification for online remaining useful life prediction with randomly missing and partially faulty sensor data

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Wei
  • Wang, Zhaoqiang
  • Cai, Zhiqiang
  • Hu, Changhua
  • Si, Shubin

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is crucial for accurate remaining useful life (RUL) prediction of equipment, playing a pivotal role in developing reliable maintenance strategies. However, in real-world online prediction scenarios, sensor monitoring data often exhibit incompleteness due to randomly missing and partially faulty sensor data, which can significantly compromise UQ effectiveness. Furthermore, existing methods like Bayesian neural networks and Gaussian process regression rely on specific distributional or model assumptions and struggle to produce statistically valid prediction intervals. To overcome these challenges, this paper introduces an innovative method — RobustUQ. It begins with a pre-training strategy to extract representations from sensor monitoring data, followed by a diffusion model to fit the distribution of missing values for effective imputation. Subsequently, conformal prediction is applied for UQ in RUL prediction, alongside deep metric learning to identify residual patterns and address the issue of non-exchangeability in spatiotemporally dependent sensor data. Theoretically, the prediction intervals constructed using this method are statistically valid. Experimental results demonstrate that RobustUQ accurately and robustly quantifies uncertainty in online RUL prediction. More importantly, RobustUQ surpasses existing methods by being distribution-independent and model-agnostic, enabling seamless integration with current RUL prediction models while delivering more precise and reliable prediction intervals.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Wei & Wang, Zhaoqiang & Cai, Zhiqiang & Hu, Changhua & Si, Shubin, 2025. "Robust uncertainty quantification for online remaining useful life prediction with randomly missing and partially faulty sensor data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003783
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025003783
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.