IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v262y2025ics0951832025003485.html

Quantum fault trees and minimal cut sets identification

Author

Listed:
  • Silva, Gabriel San Martín
  • Droguett, Enrique López

Abstract

Fault Trees represent an essential tool in the reliability and risk assessment of complex engineering systems. One of the core tasks in Fault Tree analysis is the identification of Minimal Cut Sets, defined as groups of components that present the least path of resistance toward a system's failure. Nonetheless, minimal cut set identification remains a highly challenging problem due to the exponential growth in feasible configurations as the system size increases linearly. Recently, quantum computation has been heralded as a promising tool to tackle computational challenges of increased complexity. However, its integration into reliability engineering, and in particular to challenges related to Fault Tree modeling, is still underexplored. To fill this relevant gap, this paper integrates quantum computation into the Fault Tree Model to assess its capabilities for minimal cut set identification. To this end, this paper proposes a novel approach to encode a fault tree into a quantum algorithm and perform the identification of minimal cut sets via the application of the Grover operator. For validation purposes, a series of theoretical and numerical results, the latter obtained using a quantum simulator, are presented in which the proposed algorithm is compared against a state-of-the-art non-quantum approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Silva, Gabriel San Martín & Droguett, Enrique López, 2025. "Quantum fault trees and minimal cut sets identification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003485
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025003485
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matuzas, V. & Contini, S., 2015. "Dynamic labelling of BDD and ZBDD for efficient non-coherent fault tree analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 183-192.
    2. Zhou, Siwei & Li, Zhao & Xiang, Jianwen, 2025. "Reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees with Priority-AND gates using conditional binary decision diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    3. Zixian, Liu & Xin, Ni & Yiliu, Liu & Qinglu, Song & Yukun, Wang, 2011. "Gastric esophageal surgery risk analysis with a fault tree and Markov integrated model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1591-1600.
    4. Tom Krüger & Jan-Hendrik Lorenz & Florian Wörz, 2022. "Too much information: Why CDCL solvers need to forget learned clauses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Jung, Sejin & Yoo, Junbeom & Lee, Young-Jun, 2020. "A Software Fault Tree Analysis Technique for Formal Requirement Specifications of Nuclear Reactor Protection Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Hauptmanns, Ulrich, 2010. "A decision-making framework for protecting process plants from flooding based on fault tree analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 970-980.
    7. Volkanovski, Andrija & ÄŒepin, Marko & Mavko, Borut, 2009. "Application of the fault tree analysis for assessment of power system reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(6), pages 1116-1127.
    8. Sejin Baek & Gyunyoung Heo, 2021. "Application of Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis to Prioritize Electric Power Systems in Nuclear Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Sohn, Se Do & Hyun Seong, Poong, 2006. "Testing digital safety system software with a testability measure based on a software fault tree," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 44-52.
    10. Wang, Shaoxuan & Ge, Daochuan & Yong, Nuo & Sun, Ming & Yao, Yuantao & Tao, Longlong & Xia, Dongqin & Wang, Feipeng & Yu, Jie, 2025. "Rapid computation of survival signature for dynamic fault tree based on sequential binary decision diagram and multidimensional array," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    11. Contini, S. & Cojazzi, G.G.M. & Renda, G., 2008. "On the use of non-coherent fault trees in safety and security studies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(12), pages 1886-1895.
    12. Paredes, R. & Dueñas-Osorio, L. & Meel, K.S. & Vardi, M.Y., 2019. "Principled network reliability approximation: A counting-based approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Torabi, Mina & ÄŒepin, Marko, 2026. "An extension to the Alpha Factor method for enhanced common cause failure analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 267(PB).
    2. Wang, Dan & Yin, Kai & Wang, Hailong, 2026. "Risk identification in prefabricated building construction safety systems based on STPA-TM," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yılmaz, Emre & German, Brian J. & Pritchett, Amy R., 2023. "Optimizing resource allocations to improve system reliability via the propagation of statistical moments through fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. Yoon, Jae Young & Han, Sang Hoon, 2026. "Seismic risk quantification for multi-unit probabilistic safety assessment based on the partial binary decision diagram approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
    3. Contini, Sergio & Matuzas, Vaidas, 2011. "New methods to determine the importance measures of initiating and enabling events in fault tree analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 775-784.
    4. Kai Pan & Hui Liu & Xiaoqing Gou & Rui Huang & Dong Ye & Haining Wang & Adam Glowacz & Jie Kong, 2022. "Towards a Systematic Description of Fault Tree Analysis Studies Using Informetric Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    5. Zhu, Lin & Jia, Xiang & Wang, Miao & Long, Jiahui & Li, Bingyi, 2025. "Reliability allocation of the system with k-out-of-n: G subsystems considering K-mixed redundancy strategy and heterogeneous components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PB).
    6. Shin, Sung-Min & Lee, Sang Hun & Shin, Seung Ki, 2022. "A novel approach for quantitative importance analysis of safety DI&C systems in the nuclear field," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Chan, Jianpeng & Papaioannou, Iason & Straub, Daniel, 2024. "Bayesian improved cross entropy method with categorical mixture models for network reliability assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    8. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2011. "Importance measures in risk-informed decision making: Ranking, optimisation and configuration control," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1426-1436.
    9. Leonardo Leoni & Farshad BahooToroody & Saeed Khalaj & Filippo De Carlo & Ahmad BahooToroody & Mohammad Mahdi Abaei, 2021. "Bayesian Estimation for Reliability Engineering: Addressing the Influence of Prior Choice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Tao, Haohan & Jia, Peng & Wang, Xiangyu & Wang, Liquan, 2024. "Reliability analysis of subsea control module based on dynamic Bayesian network and digital twin," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    11. Monfared, M.A.S. & Rezazadeh, Masoumeh & Alipour, Zohreh, 2022. "Road networks reliability estimations and optimizations: A Bi-directional bottom-up, top-down approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    12. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2016. "Importances of components and events in non-coherent systems and risk models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 117-122.
    13. Yoon, Jae Young & Kim, Dong-San, 2022. "Estimating the adverse effects of inter-unit radioactive release on operator actions at a multi-unit site," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    14. Niu, Yi-Feng & Gao, Zi-You & Lam, William H.K., 2017. "A new efficient algorithm for finding all d-minimal cuts in multi-state networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 151-163.
    15. Sihui Dong & Ni Jia & Shiqun Li & Yazhuo Zou, 2025. "Time-Varying Reliability Assessment of Urban Traffic Network Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Wu, Baichao & Tang, Aiping & Wu, Jie, 2016. "Modeling cascading failures in interdependent infrastructures under terrorist attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1-8.
    17. Huang, Chao & Li, Liang, 2020. "Architectural design and analysis of a steer-by-wire system in view of functional safety concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    18. Khakzad, Nima & Van Gelder, Pieter, 2018. "Vulnerability of industrial plants to flood-induced natechs: A Bayesian network approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 403-411.
    19. Cheng, Shikun & Li, Zifu & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Neupane, Kalidas & Wauthelet, Marc & Huba, Elisabeth-Maria, 2014. "Application of fault tree approach for technical assessment of small-sized biogas systems in Nepal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1372-1381.
    20. Chen, Jianzhou & Pan, Zihao & Guo, Jinyan & Chen, Chuanhai & Xu, Jingjing & Liu, Zhifeng, 2026. "Fault propagation model construction and probability calculation method for multi-state system based on directed diagrams theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.