Author
Listed:
- Wang, Heran
- Zhai, Changhai
- Ma, Liyang
- Song, Dongdong
- Xie, Lili
Abstract
Urban natural gas distribution networks are critical infrastructure systems that provide essential energy services to residential, industrial, and commercial sectors. However, these networks are highly vulnerable to earthquake-induced damage, leading to significant functionality loss and risks such as fires and explosions. To evaluate the functional status of natural gas pipeline networks under post-earthquake conditions, it is essential to develop a robust evaluation model capable of addressing large-scale component damage. This study proposes a natural gas pipeline network functionality assessment methodology that integrates islanding analysis to identify interconnected sub-networks, pressure-dependent demand modeling for user nodes, and a dual-control mechanism for gas source nodes to improve the accuracy of hydraulic calculations under accident conditions. Compared to traditional methods, the proposed approach provides a more accurate representation of natural gas pipeline network behavior under partial gas supply conditions. Validation on a representative natural gas pipeline network demonstrates its effectiveness in identifying and quantifying functional losses during extensive component failures. Comparative analysis reveals that traditional methods tend to overestimate network functionality under severe damage conditions, underscoring the advantages of the proposed approach. These findings confirm the methodology’s suitability for evaluating functionality in scenarios of severe disruption.
Suggested Citation
Wang, Heran & Zhai, Changhai & Ma, Liyang & Song, Dongdong & Xie, Lili, 2025.
"Functionality assessment of natural gas distribution networks in post-earthquake scenarios with widespread component failures,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003357
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111134
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.