Author
Listed:
- Xu, Yingchun
- Yao, Wen
- Zheng, Xiaohu
- Gong, Zhiqiang
- Yan, Lei
- Xu, Na
Abstract
In practical engineering, massive data are commonly utilized for data prediction and system reliability analysis. However, the presence of inevitable data noise can render reliability analysis results inaccurate, thereby necessitating the data uncertainty quantification. Moreover, current studies struggle to ensure both prediction accuracy and uncertainty quality simultaneously, which complicates the uncertainty quantification. To address these problems, this paper proposes a generic quality and accuracy driven uncertainty quantification framework based on deep learning methods. The proposed quality and accuracy driven sampling loss function builds the bridge between the significance level and quantile level, and constrains the mean prediction, upper and lower interval limits, significantly improving prediction accuracy and interval quality. The randomly sampled significance level is regarded as an input feature to derive the prediction interval at an aleatory confidence level, avoiding inaccuracies in reliability analysis. Additionally, the proposed framework is a universal one, applicable to any modeling method, and possesses high engineering practicability. Two numerical examples and one practical engineering case are adopted to verify the effectiveness. Results demonstrate our proposed method achieves higher prediction accuracy and uncertainty quality compared to other methods. This advancement offers credible information essential for interval reliability analysis and system health condition assessment.
Suggested Citation
Xu, Yingchun & Yao, Wen & Zheng, Xiaohu & Gong, Zhiqiang & Yan, Lei & Xu, Na, 2025.
"A generic quality and accuracy driven uncertainty quantification framework for reliability analysis,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003291
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111128
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.