Author
Listed:
- Tan, Yunlei
- Jiang, Ping
- Xing, Yunyan
- Qi, Jianjun
Abstract
Reliability Qualification Testing (RQT) is crucial for confirming that a product complies with specified reliability standards. Traditionally, practitioners design a lifetime test plan by referring to the GJB899A-2009 "Reliability Qualification and Acceptance Testing", which provides test plans subjected to the test specifications and risks. However, these plans often demand lengthy testing periods and are not practical in many scenarios where conclusions need to be provided in a short term. In this paper, a framework of test plan design with a derivation method for risk calculation is proposed for Weibull-distributed products. In this framework, to estimate the probability density distribution of product lifetime T with multiple expert judgments, a nonlinear optimization problem is modeled, and imprecise prior information is converted to combinatorial constraints. To search for parameters' approximate optimal solution, PSO-MEM is constructed, which is a framework integrating the particle swarm optimization (PSO) with the maximum entropy principle (MEM). What's more, to cover a relatively comprehensive range of test specifications and types, equations are modified under three typical distributions and two kinds of lifetime test plans. Besides, the proposed method is compared with authoritative standards like GJB 899A-2009 under different test conditions. The results show that test plans searched in this paper yield lower risk value than standard plans, which highlights the effectiveness of the new framework in deriving RQT plans under multiple imprecise information and different test modes.
Suggested Citation
Tan, Yunlei & Jiang, Ping & Xing, Yunyan & Qi, Jianjun, 2025.
"Type-â… censored reliability qualification test design for weibull products based on expert judgments,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025002753
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111074
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025002753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.