IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v261y2025ics0951832025003175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dependable policy improvement for intelligent agents in new environments

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yao
  • Liang, Zhenglin

Abstract

Intelligent agents often encounter challenges in balancing safety and performance when transitioning from general training scenarios to specific task scenarios due to unknown environmental differences. Under the uncertainty of new scenarios, safety considerations constrain extensive exploration, resulting in limited policy improvement. This paper proposes a novel reinforcement learning approach featuring a dependable policy improvement algorithm that emphasizes safety and confidence throughout the entire training process. The proposed algorithm enhances the baseline policy developed in general training scenarios to guide exploration and designs confidence bounds to evaluate both task performance and safety. By cautiously exploring and updating policies based on data confidence bounds, the approach ensures reliable agent behavior in new, uncertain, and potentially risky environments. Simulation experiments with an automatic guided vehicle (AGV) demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach across various scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yao & Liang, Zhenglin, 2025. "Dependable policy improvement for intelligent agents in new environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:261:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003175
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025003175
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:261:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.