Author
Listed:
- Sun, Jiechen
- Zhou, Funa
- Hu, Xiong
- Wang, Chaoge
- Wang, Tianzhen
Abstract
Accurate Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction model relies on full-lifecycle degradation features of the equipment. However, fragmented out-of-distribution (OOD) data due to specific working condition, equipment service time and communication packet loss inevitably affect the prediction accuracy. This study proposes a personalized federated RUL prediction method for fragmented OOD data scenarios, aiming to integrate OOD data fragments provided by different clients. In this means, a federated prediction model can be established to capture the full-lifecycle degradation features by incorporating fragmented OOD data. We focus on establishing a correctable cycle-consistent alignment mechanism driven by health state similarity to solve the challenging problem arisen by inter-client spatiotemporal heterogeneity. A novel health assessment index based on the quantile of hypothesis test is designed to capture the degradation feature required in the cycle-consistent alignment mechanism. Once new fragmented OOD data is available, a personalized federation strategy is developed by designing an adversarial mechanism between degradation features involved in the previous old OOD data and the new OOD data, such that previous degradation features can be further extended to a more full degradation feature. The superiority of the proposed method in RUL prediction was validated on fragmented OOD data collected on benchmark bearing prognostic system (BPS) platform.
Suggested Citation
Sun, Jiechen & Zhou, Funa & Hu, Xiong & Wang, Chaoge & Wang, Tianzhen, 2025.
"Personalized federated learning for remaining useful life prediction under scenarios of fragmented out-of-distribution data,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:261:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025002959
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111094
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:261:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025002959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.