IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v261y2025ics095183202500290x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comprehensive belief reliability analysis method for electronic systems considering the effect of failure mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yanfang
  • Chen, Ying
  • Li, Yingyi
  • Kang, Rui

Abstract

Complex electronic systems have been extensively employed in various engineering scenarios, necessitating the use of reasonable and effective methods for analyzing their reliability from the perspective of their performance to ensure smooth and secure operation. While numerous Physics of Failure (PoF)-based methods have identified and modeled failure causes for different system performances, there is still a lack of discussion on the direct correlation between damage caused by failure mechanisms and corresponding performance, as well as consideration of comprehensive performance requirements when analyzing system reliability. To address these issues, this paper proposes a comprehensive belief reliability analysis method for electronic systems to establish a connection between the failure mechanism and performance parameters. An S-O-P (Structure-overload-performance) belief reliability framework has been provided to analyze the reliability of complex electronic systems based on the proposed definitions of structure-related reliability, overload-related reliability and performance reliability. To implement the framework, an Improved Hybrid Bond Graph (IHBG) method is studied, and the interactions and uncertainties of the failure process are quantified. Furthermore, a delay-trigger electronic controller is utilized as an example to demonstrate the effectiveness and rationality of the proposed reliability analysis method.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yanfang & Chen, Ying & Li, Yingyi & Kang, Rui, 2025. "A comprehensive belief reliability analysis method for electronic systems considering the effect of failure mechanisms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:261:y:2025:i:c:s095183202500290x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202500290X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:261:y:2025:i:c:s095183202500290x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.