IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v261y2025ics095183202500287x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trustworthy interval prediction method with uncertainty estimation based on evidence neural networks

Author

Listed:
  • Han, Peng
  • Huang, Zhiqiu
  • Li, Weiwei
  • He, Wei
  • Cao, You

Abstract

Developing accurate and reliable prediction models is critical to ensuring the safety of the system. However, traditional deep learning only provides point predictions is not enough. For some high-risk systems, such as aerospace and autonomous driving, the reliability of model predictions needs to be assessed. This requires quantifying the uncertainty of model predictions and constructing trustworthy prediction intervals. Thus, a new trustworthy interval prediction method based on evidence neural network (TIENN) is proposed. Firstly, evidence theory and the Dirichlet distribution are integrated into deep neural networks to quantify prediction uncertainty. Secondly, modified expected utility theory is used to construct trustworthy prediction intervals. Moreover, a new loss function is designed to achieve both accurate point predictions and high-quality prediction intervals. Finally, taking the lithium-ion battery interval capacity prediction as an example to verify the effectiveness of the TIENN. The output results of the TIENN can not only be explained in clear language semantics, but also are consistent with the degradation process of lithium-ion batteries in actual engineering, thereby improving decision makers' trust in the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, Peng & Huang, Zhiqiu & Li, Weiwei & He, Wei & Cao, You, 2025. "Trustworthy interval prediction method with uncertainty estimation based on evidence neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:261:y:2025:i:c:s095183202500287x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202500287X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:261:y:2025:i:c:s095183202500287x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.