IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v261y2025ics0951832025002601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surrogate modeling for probability distribution estimation: Uniform or adaptive design?

Author

Listed:
  • Su, Maijia
  • Wang, Ziqi
  • Bursi, Oreste Salvatore
  • Broccardo, Marco

Abstract

The active learning (AL) technique, one of the state-of-the-art methods for constructing surrogate models, has shown high accuracy and efficiency in forward uncertainty quantification (UQ) analysis. This paper provides a comprehensive study on AL-based global surrogates for computing the full distribution function, i.e., the cumulative distribution function (CDF) and the complementary CDF (CCDF). To this end, we investigate the three essential components for building surrogates, i.e., types of surrogate models, enrichment methods for experimental designs, and stopping criteria. For each component, we choose several representative methods and study their desirable configurations. In addition, we use a uniform design based on maximin-distance criteria as a baseline for measuring the improvement of using AL. Combining all the representative methods, a total of 1920 UQ analyses are carried out to solve 16 benchmark examples. The performance of the selected strategies is evaluated based on accuracy and efficiency. In the context of full distribution estimation, this study concludes that (i) The benefit of using AL is lower than expected and varies across different surrogate models, with three reasons for this performance variability analyzed in detail. (ii) Detailed recommendations are provided for the three surrogate components, depending on the features of the problems (especially the local nonlinearity), target accuracy, and computational budget.

Suggested Citation

  • Su, Maijia & Wang, Ziqi & Bursi, Oreste Salvatore & Broccardo, Marco, 2025. "Surrogate modeling for probability distribution estimation: Uniform or adaptive design?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:261:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025002601
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025002601
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:261:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025002601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.