IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v169y2018icp269-280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient approximate inference in Bayesian networks with continuous variables

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Chenzhao
  • Mahadevan, Sankaran

Abstract

Inference is one key objective in a Bayesian network (BN), and it aims to estimate the posterior distributions of state variables based on evidence (observations). While efficient analytical inference algorithms (either approximate or exact) for BN with discrete variables have been well-established in the literature, the inference in BN with continuous variables is still challenging if the BN is non-linear and/or non-Gaussian. In this case we can either discretize the continuous variable and utilize the inference approaches for discrete BN; or we have to use sampling-based methods such as MCMC for static BN and particle filter for dynamic BN. This paper proposes a network collapsing technique based on the concept of probability integral transform to convert a multi-layer BN to an equivalent simple two-layer BN, so that the unscented Kalman filter can be applied to the collapsed BN and the posterior distributions of state variables can be obtained analytically. For dynamic BN, the proposed method is also able to propagate the state variables to the next time step analytically using the unscented transform, based on the assumption that the posterior distributions of state variables are Gaussian. Thus the proposed method achieves a very fast approximate solution, making it particularly suitable for dynamic BN where inference and uncertainty propagation are required over many time steps.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Chenzhao & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2018. "Efficient approximate inference in Bayesian networks with continuous variables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 269-280.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:169:y:2018:i:c:p:269-280
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.08.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832017300674
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2017.08.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sankararaman, S. & Mahadevan, S., 2013. "Separating the contributions of variability and parameter uncertainty in probability distributions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 187-199.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Daoqing & He, Jingjing & Du, Yi-Mu & Sun, C.P. & Guan, Xuefei, 2021. "Probabilistic information fusion with point, moment and interval data in reliability assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Adedipe, Tosin & Shafiee, Mahmood & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "Bayesian Network Modelling for the Wind Energy Industry: An Overview," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Wu, Bing & Tang, Yuheng & Yan, Xinping & Guedes Soares, Carlos, 2021. "Bayesian Network modelling for safety management of electric vehicles transported in RoPax ships," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McFarland, John & DeCarlo, Erin, 2020. "A Monte Carlo framework for probabilistic analysis and variance decomposition with distribution parameter uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Sarazin, Gabriel & Morio, Jérôme & Lagnoux, Agnès & Balesdent, Mathieu & Brevault, Loïc, 2021. "Reliability-oriented sensitivity analysis in presence of data-driven epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Schöbi, Roland & Sudret, Bruno, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis in the context of imprecise probabilities (p-boxes) using sparse polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 129-141.
    4. Sakurahara, Tatsuya & Schumock, Grant & Reihani, Seyed & Kee, Ernie & Mohaghegh, Zahra, 2019. "Simulation-Informed Probabilistic Methodology for Common Cause Failure Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 84-99.
    5. Kapusuzoglu, Berkcan & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2021. "Information fusion and machine learning for sensitivity analysis using physics knowledge and experimental data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    6. Wang, Pan & Lu, Zhenzhou & Ren, Bo & Cheng, Lei, 2013. "The derivative based variance sensitivity analysis for the distribution parameters and its computation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 305-315.
    7. Klemenc, Jernej, 2015. "Influence of fatigue–life data modelling on the estimated reliability of a structure subjected to a constant-amplitude loading," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 238-247.
    8. Cheng, Lei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Zhang, Leigang, 2015. "Application of Rejection Sampling based methodology to variance based parametric sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 9-18.
    9. Wang, Zhenqiang & Jia, Gaofeng, 2020. "Augmented sample-based approach for efficient evaluation of risk sensitivity with respect to epistemic uncertainty in distribution parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    10. Mullins, Joshua & Ling, You & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Sun, Lin & Strachan, Alejandro, 2016. "Separation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic model validation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 49-59.
    11. Kim, Seokgoo & Choi, Joo-Ho & Kim, Nam Ho, 2022. "Inspection schedule for prognostics with uncertainty management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    12. Luyi Li & Zhenzhou Lu, 2016. "A new algorithm for importance analysis of the inputs with distribution parameter uncertainty," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(13), pages 3065-3077, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:169:y:2018:i:c:p:269-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.