IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v139y2015icp120-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Verifying large modular systems using iterative abstraction refinement

Author

Listed:
  • Lahtinen, Jussi
  • Kuismin, Tuomas
  • Heljanko, Keijo

Abstract

Digital instrumentation and control (I&C) systems are increasingly used in the nuclear engineering domain. The exhaustive verification of these systems is challenging, and the usual verification methods such as testing and simulation are typically insufficient. Model checking is a formal method that is able to exhaustively analyse the behaviour of a model against a formally written specification. If the model checking tool detects a violation of the specification, it will give out a counter-example that demonstrates how the specification is violated in the system. Unfortunately, sometimes real life system designs are too big to be directly analysed by traditional model checking techniques. We have developed an iterative technique for model checking large modular systems. The technique uses abstraction based over-approximations of the model behaviour, combined with iterative refinement. The main contribution of the work is the concrete abstraction refinement technique based on the modular structure of the model, the dependency graph of the model, and a refinement sampling heuristic similar to delta debugging. The technique is geared towards proving properties, and outperforms BDD-based model checking, the k-induction technique, and the property directed reachability algorithm (PDR) in our experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Lahtinen, Jussi & Kuismin, Tuomas & Heljanko, Keijo, 2015. "Verifying large modular systems using iterative abstraction refinement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 120-130.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:139:y:2015:i:c:p:120-130
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015000782
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lahtinen, J. & Valkonen, J. & Björkman, K. & Frits, J. & Niemelä, I. & Heljanko, K., 2012. "Model checking of safety-critical software in the nuclear engineering domain," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 104-113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pira, Einollah & Rafe, Vahid & Nikanjam, Amin, 2019. "Using evolutionary algorithms for reachability analysis of complex software systems specified through graph transformation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Ruijun & Cheng, Yu & Chen, Dewang & Song, Haifeng, 2021. "Online quantitative safety monitoring approach for unattended train operation system considering stochastic factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Cheng, Ruijun & Zhou, Jin & Chen, Dewang & Song, Yongduan, 2016. "Model-based verification method for solving the parameter uncertainty in the train control system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 169-182.
    3. Gouyon, David & Pétin, Jean-François & Cochard, Thomas & Devic, Catherine, 2020. "Architecture assessment for safety critical plant operation using reachability analysis of timed automata," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Pakonen, Antti & Buzhinsky, I & Björkman, K, 2021. "Model checking reveals design issues leading to spurious actuation of nuclear instrumentation and control systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:139:y:2015:i:c:p:120-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.