IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pubeco/v249y2025ics0047272725001501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auctions for risk-averse non-profits

Author

Listed:
  • Carpenter, Jeffrey
  • Foster, Joshua
  • Matthews, Peter Hans

Abstract

Fundraising for non-profit organizations (NPOs) often involves converting in-kind donations into cash, commonly through charity auctions. However, little attention has been paid to the revenue distributions these mechanisms generate, an obvious concern for risk-averse NPOs deciding on a fundraising strategy. This paper introduces a theoretical framework that evaluates the first two moments of the revenue distributions accruing to ten auction formats under conditions that permit endogenous bidder participation. The resulting “revenue frontier” generated by these mechanisms reveals a robust and sizeable mean-variance tradeoff that NPOs should consider when selecting which mechanism(s) to employ. We test the model’s predictions for each auction format using both laboratory and field experiments and find evidence of a substantial (and similar) tradeoff in each setting. Additionally, we show how bidder participation can modulate an NPO’s risk exposure, conditional on the auction formats selected. These results offer important insights into how NPOs might optimize their fundraising strategies through methods of mechanism diversification.

Suggested Citation

  • Carpenter, Jeffrey & Foster, Joshua & Matthews, Peter Hans, 2025. "Auctions for risk-averse non-profits," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:249:y:2025:i:c:s0047272725001501
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272725001501
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:249:y:2025:i:c:s0047272725001501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505578 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.