IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pubeco/v249y2025ics004727272500146x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vote and trade: An efficient mechanism for common-pool resource management with stock externalities

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Hao
  • Porter, David

Abstract

The efficiency of inter-temporal resource allocation in a rights-based common-pool resource management system can be compromised by a stock externality. This occurs when one user’s extraction depletes the resource stock and then raises future harvesting costs for all users. This paper introduces a vote-and-trade (VAT) mechanism, an enhancement to standard cap-and-trade (CAT), to correct this inefficiency. VAT operates in two stages: first, resource users vote to set a binding, period-specific extraction cap; second, they trade the resulting rights in a within-period market. Our theoretical model demonstrates that while standard CAT is dynamically inefficient, VAT can achieve the social optimum under mild conditions by using voting to aggregate agents’ private information and collectively choose the optimal inter-temporal extraction path. Laboratory experiments confirm this prediction, showing that VAT substantially outperforms CAT in aggregate economic efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Hao & Porter, David, 2025. "Vote and trade: An efficient mechanism for common-pool resource management with stock externalities," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:249:y:2025:i:c:s004727272500146x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004727272500146X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C9 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments
    • D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:249:y:2025:i:c:s004727272500146x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505578 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.