Author
Listed:
- Teunter, Ruud H.
- Babai, M Zied
- Syntetos, Aris A.
Abstract
Inventory theory often assumes that demands during out-of-stock periods are backordered, although lost demands are arguably more realistic, especially in retail settings. This is, to a large extent, due to the fact that lost-sales systems are harder to analyse, especially if multiple orders can be outstanding. This paper considers the classic single-item, single-location, continuous review (R, Q) inventory model with lost sales under a cost minimization objective, where reorder level R is optimized given a fixed order quantity Q. Using approximation procedures, we derive a near-optimality condition that can be used to determine the reorder level. This can be seen as a modification and generalisation of the near-optimality condition presented by Hadley and Whitin (1963, Eq. (4-22)). A numerical analysis for a considerable set of instances shows that the new near-optimality condition outperforms that of Hadley and Whitin (1963), reducing the cost gap vs. the optimal solution from 0.12% to 0.01% under the assumptions of smooth demand (i.e. continuous or unit-sized demand) and at most a single order outstanding, and from 0.32% to 0.08% over all considered instances, including ones with multiple orders outstanding and lumpy demand. We also compare to settings where the cost expression uses the loss functions by Rosling (2002). This is optimal under the mentioned assumptions and has a cost gap of 0.24% over all considered instances. Since the conditions and the complex cost expression by Rosling (2002) are not easy to implement in real life, we also test simpler approximations based on Hadley and Whitin's (1963) and the New near-optimality condition that take the quantile of a Normal distribution. These have cost gaps to the optimal solution of 0.71% and 0.32%, respectively.
Suggested Citation
Teunter, Ruud H. & Babai, M Zied & Syntetos, Aris A., 2026.
"Deriving near-optimality conditions using approximation procedures for an inventory control system with lost sales,"
International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:proeco:v:297:y:2026:i:c:s0925527326001064
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2026.110015
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:297:y:2026:i:c:s0925527326001064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.