IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v297y2026ics0925527325002142.html

Effective mitigation policies for disaster operations management in Manufacturing Closed Loop Supply Chains: Insights for transition from unknown-unknowns to known-unknowns

Author

Listed:
  • Katsoras, Efthymios
  • Georgiadis, Patroklos
  • Vlachos, Dimitrios

Abstract

The viability of Manufacturing Supply Chains (MSCs) is strongly affected by disaster effects as they have been identified as vulnerable networks to shocks imposed by the external environment. It is remarkable that although the research agenda in disaster operations management of MSCs has received increased attention during the last decade, the studies that have been conducted on disaster-resilient Manufacturing Closed Loop Supply Chains (MCLSCs) are limited. Since disaster for an MCLSC is a risk source of unknown-unknowns, the key issue of this work is to study effective mitigation policies to provide insights for fast transition to pre-disaster operating conditions, through a methodology that combines the well-established Disaster Operations Cycle method with the Rumsfeld Matrix. To this end, the study defines short-/medium-/long-term disaster scenarios with alternative settings regarding their impact on demand and supply chain operations (production rates, shipments), as well as a set of relief policies in pre-disaster, disaster and post-disaster periods. By conducting extensive numerical experimentation in conjunction with a dynamic MCLSC model with remanufacturing and recycling under disaster effects, the system response (transient flows, inventory levels, cost, profit) is compared to that obtained from the disaster-free model by examining the manufacturer's availability of finished goods inventory and profitability. This comparative analysis of results provides managerial insights for a transition from unknown-unknowns to known-unknowns and reveals holding base stocks at the manufacturer level, as a dominant mitigation policy. In terms of manufacturer's serviceable end-product inventory, different inventory level policies before, during, and after disaster periods appear to be the best choices. It is important to note that for small- and medium-scale disaster scenarios, the differences in optimal policies are relatively small, whereas these differences become more significant during large-scale disaster scenarios. In terms of economic impact, the results show the necessity to follow a policy of a constant inventory level before, during and after disaster periods. The insensitivity of the optimal policies to any change in demand in the ±50 % range is a particularly appealing feature of the proposed policies, given the difficulty in obtaining accurate demand forecasts under disaster effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Katsoras, Efthymios & Georgiadis, Patroklos & Vlachos, Dimitrios, 2026. "Effective mitigation policies for disaster operations management in Manufacturing Closed Loop Supply Chains: Insights for transition from unknown-unknowns to known-unknowns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:297:y:2026:i:c:s0925527325002142
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325002142
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:297:y:2026:i:c:s0925527325002142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.