Author
Listed:
- Sonar, Harshad
- Ghag, Nikhil
- Sharma, Isha
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into supply chains is reshaping decision-making, yet the role of large language models (LLMs) remains under-theorized and weakly connected to operational frameworks such as the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model. Unlike conventional AI tools, LLMs are generative, rely on unstructured data, and introduce interpretability risks, creating distinct opportunities and challenges for supply chain management (SCM). This study adopts a two-phase, theory-driven approach to examine these challenges. First, LLM adoption barriers were identified through a comprehensive literature review and structured using the Technology–Organization–Environment framework and Dynamic Capability Theory, then validated using a Delphi study with industry experts. Second, the Combinative Distance-based Assessment and Comparative Solution (COCOSO) method was applied to prioritize the identified challenges. Results show that “Understanding LLM Outputs,” “Risk of Over-Reliance on AI,” and “Limitations in Complex Optimization Problems” are the most critical barriers, indicating that interpretability and human–AI interaction outweigh data-related concerns emphasized in prior AI research. In contrast to existing AI-focused SCM research, this study contributes by providing a theory-informed, expert-validated prioritization of LLM-specific adoption challenges and illustrating how these challenges relate to value creation across SCOR process layers. The study further offers a SCOR-aligned decision-support roadmap for managers and policymakers and establishes a structured foundation for future empirical research on LLM-enabled supply chains.
Suggested Citation
Sonar, Harshad & Ghag, Nikhil & Sharma, Isha, 2026.
"Bridging theory and practice in AI-driven supply chains: Prioritizing LLM adoption challenges and SCOR-based applications,"
International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:proeco:v:296:y:2026:i:c:s092552732600099x
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2026.110008
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:296:y:2026:i:c:s092552732600099x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.