Author
Listed:
- Asgari, Alireza
- Alaeddini, Morteza
- Sauer, Philipp C.
- Reaidy, Paul
Abstract
The agri-food supply chain (AFSC) needs resilience beyond organizational and dyadic levels due to its complex adaptive nature and increasing number of disruptions. Based on the investigation of expert perceptions, this study aims to explore the influence structure of social-ecological resilience capabilities to aid in understanding the complexity of resilience and informing decision making. Moreover, the prioritization of big data analytics (BDA) practices can support agri-food entities in adopting best practices for resilience improvement by using a fuzzy hybrid multiple-criteria decision analysis approach. To contribute to the two aims, first, responses from 26 distinguished supply chain resilience scientists were analyzed using a fuzzy DANP approach to uncover the influence relationships and priority weights of 19 organization, supply chain, and industry level social-ecological resilience capabilities. Second, 14 BDA practices categorized into three groups of sensing, seizing, and transforming—based on the dynamic capabilities perspective—were prioritized as judged by a total of 19 managers in three large food retailers using a fuzzy TOPSIS model, considering their assessed contribution to strengthening resilience capabilities. These capabilities have also been triangulated with secondary data to contextualize and corroborate case descriptions. The findings suggest the high prominence and net influence of adaptability and agility, alongside the centrality of collaboration, supply flexibility, and risk-aware culture within the elicited influence structure in AFSCs. Production and supply chain managers and policymakers in AFSCs can use the results to assess organizational, supply chain, and industry resilience, guiding strategic planning based on identified capability interdependencies and priority weights. In addition, retail managers can use the evaluation method to reach a consensus in their organization to better understand and implement the critical BDA practices that are prioritized for resilience enhancement in their specific context.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:296:y:2026:i:c:s0925527326000873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.