Author
Listed:
- Li, Haijiao
- Yao, Ye
- Zhang, Guoqing
Abstract
Distrust in product quality increases customers’ perceived risk and the likelihood of product returns. Lenient return policies and blockchain technology (BCT) are two key strategies for mitigating this distrust. However, the strategies incur high implementation costs. Therefore, making strategy decisions on return policy and BCT adoption is crucial for optimizing supply chain performance. This study develops analytical supply chain models involving a manufacturer and an online retailer, where the manufacturer decides whether to adopt BCT, and the retailer selects between a no-return policy and a money-back guarantee (MBG). Consequently, four cases are explored in this study. We derive the optimal decisions and corresponding profits for each case and find that customer trust in product quality increases the profits when BCT is adopted. Comparing these cases, the results suggest that the no-return policy and the MBG may incentivize the manufacturer to adopt BCT because BCT enhances product quality transparency and strengthens supply chain trust. Furthermore, the combination of BCT adoption and an MBG is optimal strategy when the quality cost coefficient is low and the net return value is positive, as the strategy simultaneously enhances customer trust and reduces the risks and costs associated with returns. Conversely, when the quality cost coefficient is high and the net return value is negative, the optimal strategy shifts to no BCT adoption and a no-return policy. Additionally, several extensions are discussed to check the robustness of the findings.
Suggested Citation
Li, Haijiao & Yao, Ye & Zhang, Guoqing, 2026.
"Return policy selection and blockchain technology adoption decision in a supply chain with quality information disclosure,"
International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:proeco:v:294:y:2026:i:c:s0925527326000265
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2026.109935
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:294:y:2026:i:c:s0925527326000265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.