Author
Listed:
- Zhu, Jiali
- Sun, Shiwei
- Li, Peilun
- Wang, Yichuan
- Mao, Di
Abstract
Blockchain technology has garnered significant attention in recent years, with the belief that it can enhance the efficiency of corporate supply chain management. Numerous Chinese listed companies have disclosed the application of supply chain technologies through their financial reports. This study explicitly addresses the research question: Does blockchain attention genuinely improve supply chain efficiency, or is it merely a symbolic response to institutional pressures? Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms from 2013 to 2021, we empirically examine the relationship between blockchain attention and supply chain efficiency (SCE), and test moderating effects of blockchain implementation cost and managers’ digital background. The findings reveal that: (1) blockchain attention is significantly negatively correlated with supply chain efficiency measured by inventory turnover rate, indicating that corporate technology disclosure is a gild disclosure under institutional pressure rather than substantive technological application; (2) the above correlated mechanism is also affected by the experience of executives in supply chain management, supply chain intensity, and the regional supply chain efficiency. This study challenges the optimistic expectations of blockchain technology, uncovers the dissipative path of technological alienation under institutional pressure. It also provides a theoretical basis for regulatory authorities to identify “fake innovation” disclosures and for enterprises to prudently implement digital transformation.
Suggested Citation
Zhu, Jiali & Sun, Shiwei & Li, Peilun & Wang, Yichuan & Mao, Di, 2026.
"Gold or gild: Does blockchain attention improve the efficiency of supply chain?,"
International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:proeco:v:293:y:2026:i:c:s0925527325003809
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109895
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:293:y:2026:i:c:s0925527325003809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.