Author
Listed:
- Huang, Song
- Peng, Yuhui
- Yu, Jinran
Abstract
This study examines the strategic interaction between an incumbent manufacturer’s agency encroachment and an online platform’s external switching in a platform supply chain. The dual-purpose platform, which considers both profit and consumer surplus, can switch to an outside manufacturer when facing the agency encroachment threat of the incumbent manufacturer. We consider the equilibrium strategy for the for-profit and dual-purpose platforms, to explore the impact of the dual-purpose concern, switching option, and agency encroachment on the firms’ profits and consumer surplus. Several interesting findings emerge from this study. First, unlike the for-profit platform, the dual-purpose platform’s switching strategy exhibits a non-trivial pattern for the switching cost. A high dual-purpose concern increases the platform’s switching motivation but inhibits the manufacturer’s agency encroachment incentive. Second, agency encroachment may benefit the platform owing to the additional commission income, and switching may hurt the platform. Importantly, the dual-purpose concern can positively affect the platform, which occurs when the agency encroachment is inhibited by dual purpose or switching. However, the pursuit of consumer surplus does not necessarily benefit consumers. Moreover, the incumbent manufacturer does not favor the dual-purpose platform scenario, particularly under the condition of high switching costs and low commissions. Finally, the extensions indicate that the incumbent manufacturer’s dual-purpose concern may show an opposite effect on the wholesale price and direct sales volume, thereby enhancing the incumbent manufacturer’s agency encroachment incentive; and imperfect product substitution weakens the dual-purpose platform’s ordering motivation.
Suggested Citation
Huang, Song & Peng, Yuhui & Yu, Jinran, 2026.
"Platform switching with manufacturer encroachment under online retailing and dual-purpose organizations,"
International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:proeco:v:293:y:2026:i:c:s0925527325003731
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109888
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:293:y:2026:i:c:s0925527325003731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.