Author
Listed:
- Brarda, Pablo Gino
- Ayala, Néstor Fabián
- Mendes, Glauco H.S.
Abstract
This study investigates the transformation process toward Digital Factories (DF) in the context of Industry 4.0. Specifically, it examines how companies may structure and segment the DF adoption process, how specific organizational objectives influence implementation, and what a recommended roadmap looks like for different DF types. A multiple case study analysis was conducted with 21 companies, including manufacturers and technology providers. Data collection was based on semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and direct observations, with a content analysis approach used to identify patterns, relationships, and technological enablers across the cases. The findings present a conceptual model linking supportive technologies, complexity levels, and organizational objectives, identifying four types of DF: Digital Model (DM), Digital Shadow (DS), Digital Twin (DT), and Industrial Metaverse (IM). The study demonstrates that companies adopt modular digital transformation strategies, integrating key technologies such as IoT, real-time analytics, AI, and extended reality in a structured sequence. The IM is introduced as a cross-cutting element that enhances human interaction and collaboration at any DF type. This study contributes to the literature by providing a structured framework for DF implementation and empirically validating DF classifications through real-world cases. The introduction of IM extends existing models, emphasizing a human-centered digital transformation. The proposed roadmap serves as a strategic guide for managers, helping them assess digital maturity, align DF adoption with business objectives, and prioritize technological investments.
Suggested Citation
Brarda, Pablo Gino & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Mendes, Glauco H.S., 2026.
"Roadmap to Digital Factories in Industry 4.0: Insights from multiple case studies,"
International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:proeco:v:292:y:2026:i:c:s0925527325003147
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109829
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:292:y:2026:i:c:s0925527325003147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.