Author
Listed:
- Benedek, Botond
- Csiki, Ottó
- Demeter, Krisztina
- Losonci, Dávid
- Szász, Levente
Abstract
While digitalization represents a widespread phenomenon, it does not always yield the expected financial benefits (digitalization paradox) and studies offer contradictory findings in this sense. This study aims to ease this contradiction by considering the potential time-lagged effects, the interrelatedness of financial indicators, and the complex nature of digitalization. We rely on the DuPont framework to investigate the impact of digitalization on interconnected financial performance indicators such as the efficiency of asset use (fixed asset turnover), profitability (EBITDA margin), and financial return (ROE), with immediate, 1-year, and 2-year effects. To assess firms’ digitalization, we analyze the annual reports of publicly listed automotive companies between 2012 and 2022 by two complementary methods (i.e., a machine learning algorithm and a keyword-centric content analysis). Panel regression results suggest that the financial impact of digitalization is not straightforward. It (i) improves fixed asset turnover both over short (same year) and longer periods (1–2 years lag); (ii) but does not lead to an increase in profitability; (iii) its impact on ROE becomes significant only after 2 years. In addition, these patterns are the same when traditional and advanced technologies are investigated separately, with a notable exception of ROE, on which traditional technologies exert both immediate and lagged positive impact. These findings suggest that companies investing in advanced digitalization can avoid the digitalization paradox through the more efficient use of assets but not through higher profitability, achieving better financial returns only in the longer run.
Suggested Citation
Benedek, Botond & Csiki, Ottó & Demeter, Krisztina & Losonci, Dávid & Szász, Levente, 2025.
"Financial impact of digitalization – A time-lagged analysis,"
International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:proeco:v:288:y:2025:i:c:s0925527325001847
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109699
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:288:y:2025:i:c:s0925527325001847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.