IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v112y2008i2p723-741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Product design with multiple suppliers for component variants

Author

Listed:
  • Balakrishnan, Nagraj (Raju)
  • Chakravarty, Amiya K.

Abstract

The issue of vendor choice has traditionally not been considered in determining the optimal set of products to produce. That is, component purchase has typically been considered only at the MRP explosion stage, well after the set of products to produce and their production quantities has been decided. This decoupling of roles may sometimes result in high acquisition cost of components. To control costs, it is crucial that unit prices of component variants, fixed costs of doing business with vendors, and their capabilities to supply different component variants be assessed before deciding which set of models to include in a product line. In our analysis, we have explicitly provided for this coupling between product choice and vendor selection, and have gone a step further by bringing in customers to determine the sales potential of the different models of a product that may be produced. We use our analysis to study the following issues: (1) how can a manufacturer decide which product models to offer and which vendors to select to offer components for these models, (2) under what situations are general vendors (who offer a larger variety of component variants) preferred to more focused vendors, (3) how much discount do focused vendors need to offer to compensate for their lack of versatility, (4) how does the fixed cost of vendor relationships influence the vendor selection decision, (5) how does the intensity of market competitiveness influence this decision, (6) how can a manufacturer work with a general vendor to exploit new market opportunities, and (7) how much incentive can a manufacturer offer focused vendors to get them to become more versatile in their capabilities. For each problem scenario, the output of our procedure tells us the set of models that should be chosen for a product line, production quantities of each model, specific vendors from whom component variants needed to produce these models should be procured, and profits to the manufacturer and each vendor selected.

Suggested Citation

  • Balakrishnan, Nagraj (Raju) & Chakravarty, Amiya K., 2008. "Product design with multiple suppliers for component variants," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 723-741, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:112:y:2008:i:2:p:723-741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(07)00242-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Xinyan & Huang, George Q., 2010. "Game-theoretic approach to simultaneous configuration of platform products and supply chains with one manufacturing firm and multiple cooperative suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 121-136, March.
    2. L. X. Cui, 2016. "Joint optimization of production planning and supplier selection incorporating customer flexibility: an improved genetic approach," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 1017-1035, October.
    3. Caridi, Maria & Pero, Margherita & Sianesi, Andrea, 2012. "Linking product modularity and innovativeness to supply chain management in the Italian furniture industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 207-217.
    4. Velásquez, J.D. & Nof, S.Y., 2009. "Best-matching protocols for assembly in e-work networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 508-516, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:112:y:2008:i:2:p:723-741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.