IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/poleco/v87y2025ics017626802500031x.html

Do large, sustained economic freedom reforms hurt or improve women's economic rights?

Author

Listed:
  • Rutar, Tibor

Abstract

Does economic freedom come at the expense of women's economic rights, or does it instead help improve them? Presently, there are almost no studies investigating this issue, and what evidence exists is mostly correlational. This paper presents findings from matching analyses with the explicit aim of addressing the likely endogenous relationship between economic freedom and respect for women's economic rights. Using the latest data (up to 2022), estimates from matching methods, as well as supplementary regressions based on conditional mixed-processes, all point to economic freedom having an improving effect. Two components of economic freedom – sound money and freedom of international trade – seem most likely to drive the aggregate result. The uncovered positive aggregate effect is robust to an extensive set of control variables, tweaks in the operationalization of treatment, and varying the post-treatment period.

Suggested Citation

  • Rutar, Tibor, 2025. "Do large, sustained economic freedom reforms hurt or improve women's economic rights?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:poleco:v:87:y:2025:i:c:s017626802500031x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S017626802500031X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102671?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2024. "Women, Business and the Law 2024 [Les Femmes, l’Entreprise et le Droit 2024]," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 41040, April.
    2. Esther Duflo, 2012. "Women Empowerment and Economic Development," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 50(4), pages 1051-1079, December.
    3. Jutta Bolt & Jan Luiten van Zanden, 2025. "Maddison‐style estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 631-671, April.
    4. Neumayer, Eric & de Soysa, Indra, 2005. "Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment and Child Labor," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 43-63, January.
    5. Eric Neumayer & Indra De Soysa, 2007. "Globalisation, Women's Economic Rights and Forced Labour," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(10), pages 1510-1535, October.
    6. Neumayer, Eric & Soysa, Indra de, 2006. "Globalization and the Right to Free Association and Collective Bargaining: An Empirical Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 31-49, January.
    7. David Roodman, 2011. "Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 11(2), pages 159-206, June.
    8. Nicole Detraz & Dursun Peksen, 2016. "The Effect of IMF Programs on Women’s Economic and Political Rights," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 81-105, January.
    9. Marcella Corsi & Giulia Porino, 2024. "Rise of inflation and the gender pension gap: what role for monetary policy?," Chapters, in: Louis-Philippe Rochon & Sylvio Kappes & Guillaume Vallet (ed.), Central Banking, Monetary Policy and Gender, chapter 2, pages 38-59, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Murphy, Ryan H., 2024. "Mapping inflation to economic freedom in the post-COVID era," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20, pages 1-1, January.
    11. Berggren, Niclas & Bjørnskov, Christian, 2013. "Does religiosity promote property rights and the rule of law?," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 161-185, June.
    12. Standing, Guy, 1999. "Global Feminization Through Flexible Labor: A Theme Revisited," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 583-602, March.
    13. King, Gary & Nielsen, Richard, 2019. "Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 435-454, October.
    14. Arye L. Hillman & Niklas Potrafke, 2016. "Economic Freedom and Religion: An Empirical Investigation," CESifo Working Paper Series 6017, CESifo.
    15. Robert G. Blanton & Shannon L. Blanton, 2012. "Labor Rights and Foreign Direct Investment: Is There a Race to the Bottom?," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 267-294, July.
    16. Jamie Bologna Pavlik & Robin M. Grier & Kevin B. Grier, 2023. "Two birds with one stone: Reducing corruption raises national income," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(4), pages 406-422, July.
    17. Stroup, Michael D., 2008. "Separating the influence of capitalism and democracy on women's well-being," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 67(3-4), pages 560-572, September.
    18. Robert Lawson & Vincent Miozzi & Meg Tuszynski, 2024. "Economic freedom and growth, income, investment, and inequality: A quantitative summary of the literature," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 90(4), pages 1099-1135, April.
    19. Robert A. Lawson & Ryan Murphy & Benjamin Powell, 2020. "The Determinants Of Economic Freedom: A Survey," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 38(4), pages 622-642, October.
    20. Weihua An & Christopher Winship, 2017. "Causal Inference in Panel Data With Application to Estimating Race-of-Interviewer Effects in the General Social Survey," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 46(1), pages 68-102, January.
    21. Grier, Kevin B. & Grier, Robin M., 2021. "The Washington consensus works: Causal effects of reform, 1970-2015," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 59-72.
    22. Eelke de Jong, 2024. "The influence of the market economy and economic freedom on culture," Chapters, in: Niclas Berggren (ed.), Handbook of Research on Economic Freedom, chapter 18, pages 259-272, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    23. Davis, Lewis S. & Williamson, Claudia R., 2019. "Does individualism promote gender equality?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-1.
    24. repec:jpe:journl:2045 is not listed on IDEAS
    25. Callais, Justin T. & Young, Andrew T., 2023. "A rising tide that lifts all boats: An analysis of economic freedom and inequality using matching methods," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 744-777.
    26. Hasim Ak a & Ahmet Yilmaz Ata & Coskun Karaca, 2012. "Inflation and Corruption Relationship: Evidence from Panel Data in Developed and Developing Countries," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 2(3), pages 281-295.
    27. Niclas Berggren & Henrik Jordahl, 2006. "Free to Trust: Economic Freedom and Social Capital," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 141-169, May.
    28. Rosemarie Fike, 2024. "Economic freedom and gender," Chapters, in: Niclas Berggren (ed.), Handbook of Research on Economic Freedom, chapter 19, pages 273-296, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    29. Davis, Lewis S. & Williamson, Claudia R., 2022. "Individualism and women's economic rights," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 579-597.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rutar, Tibor & Rutar, Minea, 2025. "Liberalizing reforms do not cause suicide: Causal estimation using matching, 1980–2019," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 272-289.
    2. Jamie Bologna Pavlik & Justin T. Callais, 2025. "Good for the goose, bad for the gander? Corruption and income inequality," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 91(3), pages 850-880, January.
    3. Justin Callais & Andrew T. Young, 2021. "Does constitutional entrenchment matter for economic freedom?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(4), pages 808-830, October.
    4. Callais, Justin T. & Young, Andrew T., 2023. "A rising tide that lifts all boats: An analysis of economic freedom and inequality using matching methods," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 744-777.
    5. Callais, Justin & Harris, Colin & Borchard, Ben, 2022. "The moral costs of markets: Testing the deterioration hypothesis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 200-220.
    6. Dursun Peksen & Robert G. Blanton, 2017. "The impact of ILO conventions on worker rights: Are empty promises worse than no promises?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 75-94, March.
    7. Messerschmidt, Luca & Janz, Nicole, 2023. "Unravelling the ‘race to the bottom’ argument: Foreign direct investment and different types of labour rights," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Luca Messerschmidt & Nicole Janz, 2020. "Unravelling the 'race to the bottom' argument: How does FDI affect different types of labour rights?," Munich Papers in Political Economy 05, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
    9. Blanton, Robert G. & Blanton, Shannon Lindsey & Peksen, Dursun, 2015. "Financial Crises and Labor: Does Tight Money Loosen Labor Rights?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-12.
    10. Jamie Bologna Pavlik & Benjamin Powell & Andrew T. Young, 2022. "Does aid cause changes in economic freedom?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(1), pages 90-111, July.
    11. Justin Callais & Kelly Hyde & Ilia Murtazashvili & Yang Zhou, 2024. "How does economic freedom influence public health? Evidence from U.S. cities," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 90(3), pages 656-681, January.
    12. James E. Payne & James W. Saunoris & Saban Nazlioglu & Russell S. Sobel, 2025. "Correction to: What factors drive cross‑country economic freedom convergence?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 204(3), pages 561-561, September.
    13. Rayamajhee, Veeshan & March, Raymond J., 2025. "Does economic liberalization increase government accountability?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    14. Grier, Robin & Grier, Kevin & Muhoza, Florence, 2025. "The effect of increased women's legislative representation on women's well-being," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    15. Callais, Justin T. & Geloso, Vincent J. & Plemmons, Alicia M. & Wagner, Gary A., 2025. "Institutions Matter: Economic freedom and income mobility," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    16. Justin Callais & Kerianne Lawson, 2024. "Underperforming reformers: Examining disappointing cases of economic reforms," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(3), pages 593-615, August.
    17. Yana van der Meulen Rodgers & Gunseli Berik, 2006. "Asia's Race to Capture Post-MFA Markets: A Snapshot of Labor Standards, Compliance, and Impacts on Competitiveness," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2006_02, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
    18. Deniz, Pinar & Stengos, Thanasis, 2025. "Heterogeneity of institutions and model uncertainty in the income inequality nexus," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Baliamoune–Lutz, Mina & McGillivray, Mark, 2015. "The impact of gender inequality in education on income in Africa and the Middle East," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-11.
    20. Arye L. Hillman & Niklas Potrafke, 2018. "Economic Freedom and Religion," Public Finance Review, , vol. 46(2), pages 249-275, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:poleco:v:87:y:2025:i:c:s017626802500031x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505544 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.