Author
Abstract
Dual bottlenecks based on sudden bottlenecks and fixed bottlenecks may be induced in the confluence area of expressways, which can partially undermine the advantages of expressways. To address traffic problems caused by traffic bottlenecks, a DSLC method for the confluence area considering the impact of dual bottlenecks has been determined. Traffic infarction is selected as the traffic event inducing sudden bottlenecks in the SSLC, without further considering fixed bottlenecks and the real-time changes in traffic states and corresponding speeds. Therefore, on the one hand, the CA model is improved based on consideration of DSLC, thereby determining the corresponding traffic flow evolution model. On the other hand, the dual-bottleneck problem is comprehensively considered based on the static speed limit model, thereby determining the DSLC strategy for confluence areas, and the real-time traffic infarction probability and traffic state in the confluence area are used as dual criteria for initiating speed limit control. Based on the established simulation scenario and experimental scheme mainly consisting of ISLC, SSLC, and DSLC, while a one-hour simulation experiment is conducted to extract corresponding data on speed, traffic density, CI, TR, and headway are extracted, and analysis is conducted with the data to validate the effectiveness of DSLC. Furthermore, the effectiveness of DSLC is further validated by comparing the change rate of TR with DSLC, DVSL, and DZPC. Results indicate that compared to ISLC, DSLC achieved an increase in speed and a decrease in traffic density, a 1.879% decrease in CI and a 22.819% decrease in TR. Compared to SSLC, the four indicators under DSLC exhibited identical changes. This indicates that DSLC contributes to improving traffic conditions to some extent. Compared to DVSL and DZPC, DSLC exhibits a higher change rate of TR, thereby validating the superior effectiveness of DSLC.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:694:y:2026:i:c:s0378437126002670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.