IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v692y2026ics0378437126002323.html

Why we experience society differently: Intrinsic dispositions as drivers of ideological complexity in adaptive social networks

Author

Listed:
  • Gangadhar, Akshay
  • Sayama, Hiroki

Abstract

Understanding the emergence of inequality in complex systems requires attention to both structural dynamics and intrinsic heterogeneity. In the context of opinion dynamics, traditional models relied on static snapshots or assumed homogeneous agent behavior, overlooking how diverse cognitive dispositions shape belief evolution. While some recent models introduce behavioral heterogeneity, they typically focus on macro-level patterns, neglecting the unequal and individualized dynamics that unfold at the agent level. In this study, we analyze an adaptive social network model where each agent exhibits one of three behavioral tendencies — homophily, neophily (attention to novelty), or social conformity — and measure the complexity of individual opinion trajectories using normalized Lempel–Ziv (nLZ) complexity. We find that the resulting dynamics are often counterintuitive—homophilic agents, despite seeking similarity, become increasingly unpredictable; neophilic agents, despite pursuing novelty, exhibit constrained exploration; and conformic agents display a two-phase trajectory, transitioning from early suppression of variability to later unpredictability. More fundamentally, these patterns remain similar across diverse network settings, suggesting that internal behavioral dispositions — rather than external environment alone — play a central role in shaping long-term opinion unpredictability. The broader implication is that individuals’ experiences of ideological volatility, uncertainty, or stability are not merely environmental, but may be endogenously self-structured through their own cognitive tendencies. These results establish a novel individual-level lens on opinion dynamics, where the behavioral identity of agents serves as a dynamical fingerprint in the evolution of belief systems, and gives rise to persistent disparities in dynamical experience within self-organizing social systems, even in structurally similar environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Gangadhar, Akshay & Sayama, Hiroki, 2026. "Why we experience society differently: Intrinsic dispositions as drivers of ideological complexity in adaptive social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 692(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:692:y:2026:i:c:s0378437126002323
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2026.131496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437126002323
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2026.131496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:692:y:2026:i:c:s0378437126002323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.