IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v681y2026ics0378437125007204.html

Interpretable knowledge tracing via fine-grained multi-feature attribution

Author

Listed:
  • Liang, Hang
  • Wen, Yi-Fei
  • Du, Yajun
  • Chen, Xiaoliang
  • Zhou, Tao
  • Lee, Yan-Li

Abstract

With the growth of massive educational data and the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence technologies, knowledge tracing has become increasingly important for assessing students’ knowledge states. Existing deep learning-based knowledge tracing models have achieved increasingly high predictive accuracy. However, they fail to capture significant features with explicit educational significance, which limits educators’ understanding, trust, and practical use of the diagnostic results. In this paper, we propose a Fine-Grained Multi-Feature Attribution Interpretable Knowledge Tracing model (MFA-IKT for short). It integrates educational theories with students’ learning behavior pattern, modeling fine-grained features of questions in terms of difficulty and discrimination and capturing the multidimensional dynamic features of students on knowledge mastery and ability profile. A Tree-Augmented Naive Bayes structure is adopted to construct the dependencies between the evidence features and the prediction outcomes. Experiments on five real-world datasets show that our model outperforms all baselines, including deep learning-based models, achieving average improvements of 9.28% in AUC and 9.99% in RMSE. Further analysis reveals that question-side features have a greater impact than student-side features. Among the fine-grained question features, discriminative features significantly enhance the model’s predictive performance. This study, through modeling interpretable features and attributing prediction outcomes, presents an explainable intelligent tutoring framework for personalized education, comprising “learning outcome prediction → feature attribution → instructional intervention suggestions”.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang, Hang & Wen, Yi-Fei & Du, Yajun & Chen, Xiaoliang & Zhou, Tao & Lee, Yan-Li, 2026. "Interpretable knowledge tracing via fine-grained multi-feature attribution," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 681(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:681:y:2026:i:c:s0378437125007204
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2025.131068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437125007204
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2025.131068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi Cao & Tao Zhou & Jian Gao, 2024. "Heterogeneous peer effects of college roommates on academic performance," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Xiaoou & Liu, Jingchen & Ying, Zhiliang, 2025. "Item response theory—a statistical framework for educational and psychological measurement," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120810, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Paul Rosenbaum, 1984. "Testing the conditional independence and monotonicity assumptions of item response theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(3), pages 425-435, September.
    4. Qiu, Can & Long, Baoxin & Yu, Dengxiu & Cheong, Kang Hao, 2023. "Evolving the classroom: A mathematical and didactic exploration of teacher-guided peer learning," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Margaret Wu & Hak Ping Tam & Tsung-Hau Jen, 2016. "Classical Test Theory," Springer Books, in: Educational Measurement for Applied Researchers, chapter 0, pages 73-90, Springer.
    6. Jaap M J Murre & Joeri Dros, 2015. "Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus’ Forgetting Curve," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Seo, Jibeom & Kim, Beom Jun, 2025. "Opinion dynamics model of collaborative learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 672(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Béguin & C. Glas, 2001. "MCMC estimation and some model-fit analysis of multidimensional IRT models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 541-561, December.
    2. Calvin Thigpen & Kelcie Ralph & Nicholas J. Klein & Anne Brown, 2023. "Can information increase support for transportation reform? Results from an experiment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 893-912, June.
    3. Bonan, Jacopo & Cattaneo, Cristina & D’Adda, Giovanna & Tavoni, Massimo, 2019. "Can We Make Social Information Programs More Effective? The Role of Identity and Values," RFF Working Paper Series 19-21, Resources for the Future.
    4. Jules Ellis & Arnold Wollenberg, 1993. "Local homogeneity in latent trait models. A characterization of the homogeneous monotone irt model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(3), pages 417-429, September.
    5. Andrew J. Stier & Sina Sajjadi & Fariba Karimi & Luís M. A. Bettencourt & Marc G. Berman, 2024. "Implicit racial biases are lower in more populous more diverse and less segregated US cities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Thum, Anna-Elisabeth, 2013. "Psychology in econometric models: conceptual and methodological foundations," MPRA Paper 52293, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Paul Holland, 1990. "On the sampling theory roundations of item response theory models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 577-601, December.
    8. Jesper Tijmstra & Herbert Hoijtink & Klaas Sijtsma, 2015. "Evaluating Manifest Monotonicity Using Bayes Factors," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 880-896, December.
    9. Jesper Tijmstra & Maria Bolsinova, 2019. "Bayes Factors for Evaluating Latent Monotonicity in Polytomous Item Response Theory Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(3), pages 846-869, September.
    10. Green, Alan, 2024. "Are we doing homework wrong? The marginal effect of homework using spaced repetition," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    11. Paul Rosenbaum, 1989. "Criterion-related construct validity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(4), pages 625-633, September.
    12. Pascal Jordan & Martin Spiess, 2012. "Generalizations of Paradoxical Results in Multidimensional Item Response Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 127-152, January.
    13. Francesco Bartolucci & Antonio Forcina, 2005. "Likelihood inference on the underlying structure of IRT models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 31-43, March.
    14. Lin, Tin-Chun, 2024. "Can instruction in consumer choice theory in introduction to microeconomics benefit student learning in upper-level economics courses? The example of public finance," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    15. Jesper Tijmstra & David Hessen & Peter Heijden & Klaas Sijtsma, 2013. "Testing Manifest Monotonicity Using Order-Constrained Statistical Inference," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 83-97, January.
    16. Su, Liangjun & White, Halbert, 2014. "Testing conditional independence via empirical likelihood," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 27-44.
    17. Youn Seon Lim & Fritz Drasgow, 2019. "Conditional Independence and Dimensionality of Cognitive Diagnostic Models: a Test for Model Fit," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(2), pages 295-305, July.
    18. Haohang Li & Yupeng Cao & Yangyang Yu & Shashidhar Reddy Javaji & Zhiyang Deng & Yueru He & Yuechen Jiang & Zining Zhu & Koduvayur Subbalakshmi & Guojun Xiong & Jimin Huang & Lingfei Qian & Xueqing Pe, 2024. "INVESTORBENCH: A Benchmark for Financial Decision-Making Tasks with LLM-based Agent," Papers 2412.18174, arXiv.org.
    19. Yuri Goegebeur & Paul Boeck & James Wollack & Allan Cohen, 2008. "A Speeded Item Response Model with Gradual Process Change," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 65-87, March.
    20. Xi Zhang & Rui Gao & Jin Ling Lin & Ning Chen & Qin Lin & Gui Fang Huang & Long Wang & Xiao Huan Chen & Fang Qin Xue & Hong Li, 2020. "Effects of hospital‐family holistic care model on the health outcome of patients with permanent enterostomy based on the theory of ‘Timing It Right’," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2196-2208, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:681:y:2026:i:c:s0378437125007204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.