IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v505y2018icp233-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantum work fluctuations versus macrorealism in terms of non-extensive entropies

Author

Listed:
  • Rastegin, Alexey E.

Abstract

Fluctuations of the work performed on a driven quantum system can be characterized by the so-called fluctuation theorems. The Jarzynski relation and the Crooks theorem are famous examples of exact equalities characterizing non-equilibrium dynamics. Such statistical theorems are typically formulated in a similar manner in both classical and quantum physics. Leggett–Garg inequalities are inspired by the two assumptions referred to as the macroscopic realism and the non-invasive measurability. Together, these assumptions are known as the macrorealism in the broad sense. Quantum mechanics is provably incompatible with restrictions of the Leggett–Garg type. It turned out that Leggett–Garg inequalities can be used to distinguish quantum and classical work fluctuations. We develop this issue with the use of entropic functions of the Tsallis type. Varying the entropic parameter, we are often able to reach more robust detection of violations of the corresponding Leggett–Garg inequalities. In reality, all measurement devices suffer from losses. Within the entropic formulation, detection inefficiencies can naturally be incorporated into the consideration. This question also shows advantages that are provided due to the use of generalized entropies.

Suggested Citation

  • Rastegin, Alexey E., 2018. "Quantum work fluctuations versus macrorealism in terms of non-extensive entropies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 233-242.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:505:y:2018:i:c:p:233-242
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.03.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437118303509
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2018.03.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:505:y:2018:i:c:p:233-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.