IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v389y2010i21p4564-4570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Steepest entropy increase is justified by information theory. The relations between Ziegler’s principle, Onsager’s formalism and Prigogine’s principle

Author

Listed:
  • Bordel, Sergio

Abstract

Evidence for Ziegler’s principle of maximum entropy production has been accumulated from different fields such as climatic studies, crystal growth, dynamics of ecosystems and cellular metabolism. However, Ziegler’s principle is still seen with scepticism by the scientific community. The reasons for this scepticism are the absence of an accepted theoretical justification as well as the fact that Ziegler’s principle formulation seems to contradict Prigogine’s principle of minimum entropy production. In this work we aim to provide a theoretical justification for Ziegler’s principle based on information theory, which is at the basis of Gibbs’ formalism for statistical physics. Similar approaches have previously been attempted, however we believe that the justification provided here is simpler and relies in less questionable hypotheses. Once Ziegler’s principle has been formulated as a consequence of information theory, its relations with Onsager’s formulation and Prigogine’s principle are explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Bordel, Sergio, 2010. "Steepest entropy increase is justified by information theory. The relations between Ziegler’s principle, Onsager’s formalism and Prigogine’s principle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(21), pages 4564-4570.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:389:y:2010:i:21:p:4564-4570
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2010.06.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437110005984
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2010.06.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:389:y:2010:i:21:p:4564-4570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.