IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v99y2026ics0927538x26001411.html

How volatility model specification affects volatility targeting performance: Evidence from Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Jr-Wei
  • Yang, Sharon S.

Abstract

Investors show growing interest in portfolio risk management involving volatility-adjusted allocations. This study develops and assesses a framework for implementing such strategies in Taiwan's equity market, with particular emphasis on how modeling decisions affect investment outcomes. We build on previous research—especially, the conditional approach proposed by Bongaerts et al. (2020) and the ARMA-GARCH framework with jump components discussed by Maheu and McCurdy (2004) and Huang et al. (2024)— by examining the outcomes when different log-return-generating processes are chosen to make predictions. Empirical analysis based on the Taiwan Capitalization Weighted Stock Index shows that this combined specification provides better portfolio performance when it is employed in conjunction with a conditional volatility-targeting allocation rule. A cross-sectional analysis of financial, semiconductor, and food industry indices reveals that conditional volatility targeting strategies have different effects in different sectors. These findings underscore the importance of tailoring volatility models to the underlying distributional characteristics of market log-returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Jr-Wei & Yang, Sharon S., 2026. "How volatility model specification affects volatility targeting performance: Evidence from Taiwan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s0927538x26001411
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2026.103195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X26001411
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2026.103195?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s0927538x26001411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.